Ability for a stateful PCE to request and obtain control of a LSP
draft-raghu-pce-lsp-control-request-05

Document Type Replaced Internet-Draft (individual)
Last updated 2017-10-30
Replaced by draft-ietf-pce-lsp-control-request
Stream (None)
Intended RFC status (None)
Formats
Expired & archived
plain text pdf html bibtex
Stream Stream state (No stream defined)
Consensus Boilerplate Unknown
RFC Editor Note (None)
IESG IESG state Replaced by draft-ietf-pce-lsp-control-request
Telechat date
Responsible AD (None)
Send notices to (None)

This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft can be found at
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-raghu-pce-lsp-control-request-05.txt

Abstract

The stateful Path Computation Element (PCE) communication Protocol (PCEP) extensions provide stateful control of Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Traffic Engineering Label Switched Paths (TE LSP) via PCEP, for a model where a Path Computation Client (PCC) delegates control over one or more locally configured LSPs to a stateful PCE. There are use-cases in which a stateful PCE may wish to request and obtain control of one or more LSPs from a PCC. This document describes a simple extension to stateful PCEP to achieve such an objective.

Authors

Aswatnarayan Raghuram (ar2521@att.com)
Al Goddard (ag6941@att.com)
Chaitanya Yadlapalli (cy098d@att.com)
Jay Karthik (jakarthi@cisco.com)
Siva Sivabalan (msiva@cisco.com)
Jon Parker (jdparker@cisco.com)
Dhruv Dhody (dhruv.ietf@gmail.com)

(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)