The Need for Extended Forward Erasure Correction (FEC) Schemes: Problem Position
draft-roca-rmt-extended-fec-problem-00
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Vincent Roca , Aline Roumy , Bessem Sayadi | ||
| Last updated | 2013-01-31 (Latest revision 2012-07-30) | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
This document discusses the limits of [RFC5052]-compliant traditional FEC schemes, and in particular for two use-cases that are not efficiently addressed, namely Unequal Erasure Protection (UEP) of subsets of an object and file bundle protection. This document defines the problem but not the potential solutions. This is left to companion documents.
Authors
Vincent Roca
Aline Roumy
Bessem Sayadi
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)