Skip to main content

APSIX: Minimal Primitive Contract for Portable Semantic Runtimes
draft-romanchuk-apsix-00

Document Type Expired Internet-Draft (individual)
Expired & archived
Author Oleg Romanchuk
Last updated 2026-09-15 (Latest revision 2026-03-14)
RFC stream (None)
Intended RFC status (None)
Formats
Stream Stream state (No stream defined)
Consensus boilerplate Unknown
RFC Editor Note (None)
IESG IESG state Expired
Telechat date (None)
Responsible AD (None)
Send notices to (None)

This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:

Abstract

This document proposes *APSIX* (_Agent Portable Semantic Interface eXtension_) as a minimal primitive contract for portable semantic runtimes. The goal is not to standardize agent personalities, prompt formats, planner graphs, or model-specific reasoning behavior. The goal is to standardize the smallest useful contract of the runtime environment itself. The design reflects runtime patterns observed in early governed semantic-runtime implementations. In those implementations, the primary managed resource is bounded semantic territory, and spawned actor populations are the main source of pressure on that resource. APSIX defines the lower-layer contract required for such runtimes to become portable across implementations. The contract is intentionally narrow. It standardizes logical objects, lifecycle primitives, membrane-mediated decisions, capability semantics, event and provenance requirements, replay obligations, and progressive compliance profiles. It does not standardize model internals, scheduling strategies, storage engines, user interfaces, or application-specific orchestration logic. The document is written to stand on its own as a self-contained runtime specification, without dependency on unpublished external framing. This is a draft specification, not a final standard. The current name is provisional; the technical target is a portable primitive surface for governed semantic runtimes. This document is intended as a *research specification*, not as an immediate industry standardization proposal. Its purpose is to define a portability target early enough that emerging runtime implementations do not harden around mutually incompatible framework- local abstractions before a shared primitive vocabulary exists.

Authors

Oleg Romanchuk

(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)