Workload Identifier Origin Hint for TLS ClientHello
draft-rosomakho-tls-wimse-cert-hint-02
This document is an Internet-Draft (I-D).
Anyone may submit an I-D to the IETF.
This I-D is not endorsed by the IETF and has no formal standing in the
IETF standards process.
| Document | Type | Active Internet-Draft (individual) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Yaroslav Rosomakho , Jonathan Hoyland | ||
| Last updated | 2026-03-02 | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | I-D Exists | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
draft-rosomakho-tls-wimse-cert-hint-02
Transport Layer Security Y. Rosomakho
Internet-Draft Zscaler
Intended status: Standards Track J. Hoyland
Expires: 3 September 2026 Cloudflare
2 March 2026
Workload Identifier Origin Hint for TLS ClientHello
draft-rosomakho-tls-wimse-cert-hint-02
Abstract
This document defines a TLS extension that allows clients to indicate
one or more workload identifier origins in the ClientHello message.
Each origin consists of a URI scheme and trust domain component,
representing the administrative domain and identifier namespace in
which the client operates. These identifier origins serve as hints
to enable the server to determine whether client authentication is
required and which policies or trust anchors should apply. This
mechanism improves efficiency in mutual TLS deployments while
minimising the exposure of sensitive identifier information. To
protect confidentiality, this extension can be used in conjunction
with Encrypted Client Hello (ECH).
About This Document
This note is to be removed before publishing as an RFC.
The latest revision of this draft can be found at
https://yaroslavros.github.io/tls-wimse-cert-hint/draft-rosomakho-
tls-wimse-cert-hint.html. Status information for this document may
be found at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-rosomakho-tls-
wimse-cert-hint/.
Discussion of this document takes place on the Transport Layer
Security mailing list (mailto:tls@ietf.org), which is archived at
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/. Subscribe at
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls/.
Source for this draft and an issue tracker can be found at
https://github.com/yaroslavros/tls-wimse-cert-hint.
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Rosomakho & Hoyland Expires 3 September 2026 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft Workload Identifier Origin Hint for TLS March 2026
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on 3 September 2026.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2026 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/
license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document.
Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights
and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components
extracted from this document must include Revised BSD License text as
described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are
provided without warranty as described in the Revised BSD License.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2. Conventions and Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
3. TLS Extension Format . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
3.1. Server Processing Rules . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
4. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
4.1. Confidentiality of Workload Identifier Origins . . . . . 5
4.2. Unauthenticated Hints . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
4.3. Identifier Origins Enumeration . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
4.4. Server Response Behaviour . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
5. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
6. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
Rosomakho & Hoyland Expires 3 September 2026 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft Workload Identifier Origin Hint for TLS March 2026
1. Introduction
Mutual TLS (mTLS) is commonly used to authenticate both endpoints of
a [TLS] connection, especially in service-to-service communication
within distributed systems. In many deployments, client
authentication is conditional: only certain clients are required to
present a certificate, and the decision is based on the nature of the
client.
This document defines a TLS extension that allows clients to indicate
one or more workload identifier origins in the ClientHello message
(Section 4.1.2 of [TLS]). As defined in Section 4.5 of
[WIMSE-IDENTIFIER], workload identifier origin is a subset of
workload identifier and consists of a URI scheme and a trust domain
(e.g., spiffe://example.org or wimse://botfarm.example.com). It
indicates a namespace under which the client may present an
authenticated identifier. Workload identifier origins act as hints
that inform the server of the client intended identifier before the
TLS handshake is completed. Based on this information, the server
can determine whether client certificate authentication is desirable
and, if so, what policy or certificate validation rules should apply.
This approach enables more flexible and efficient authentication
strategies in environments where different clients may be subject to
different requirements. For example:
* A server may enforce mTLS only for clients of specific workload
identifier origin and allow others to connect without client
certificate authentication on TLS layer.
* A server may use the provided workload identifier origins to
generate an appropriate list of Certificate Authorities extension
(Section 4.2.4 of [TLS]) in CertificateRequest message
(Section 4.3.2 of [TLS]).
* The server may reject the connection early if none of the
advertised workload identifier origins are authorized.
By only sending scheme and trust domain (omitting the path), this
extension limits exposure of cleartext information. Where further
confidentiality is desired, clients are encouraged to include this
extension only in ClientHelloInner of Encrypted Client Hello ([ECH])
to ensure confidentiality of the workload identifier origins.
Rosomakho & Hoyland Expires 3 September 2026 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft Workload Identifier Origin Hint for TLS March 2026
2. Conventions and Definitions
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
"OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in
BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all
capitals, as shown here.
3. TLS Extension Format
This document defines a new TLS extension named
workload_identifier_origin_hint, which is carried in the ClientHello
message. The extension provides the server with one or more workload
identifier origins that the client associates with itself. This
allows the server to evaluate authentication requirements prior to
sending a CertificateRequest message.
The workload_identifier_origin_hint extension is structured as
follows:
opaque WorkloadIdentifierOrigin<1..2^16-1>;
struct {
WorkloadIdentifierOrigin identifierorigins<3..2^16-1>;
} WorkloadIdentifierOriginHintExtension;
identifierOrigins: A list of UTF-8 encoded absolute URI strings as
defined in [URI] containing only the scheme and trust domain
components of Workload Identifiers as defined in Section 4.5 of
[WIMSE-IDENTIFIER]. URI strings MUST NOT contain a path
component.
Clients MAY include multiple identity origins if they operate within
more than one trust domain or namespace.
The extension MUST appear only in the ClientHello. Servers MUST
abort TLS handshake with an illegal_parameter alert if this extension
appears in any other handshake message. Similarly, clients MUST
abort TLS handshake if this extension appears in any message from the
server.
3.1. Server Processing Rules
Upon receiving the extension, the server:
* MAY use the identifier origins to determine whether to send a
CertificateRequest message.
Rosomakho & Hoyland Expires 3 September 2026 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft Workload Identifier Origin Hint for TLS March 2026
* MAY use the identifier origins to construct Certificate
Authorities extension in the CertificateRequest message.
* MAY use the identifier origins to select a trust anchor or policy.
* MAY reject the handshake early with handshake_failure alert if
none of the identifier origins are acceptable.
* MUST NOT treat inclusion of the extension as proof of identity.
The identifier origins are advisory and unauthenticated until
verified during client authentication.
If the extension is absent, the server proceeds with the default
client authentication behavior.
4. Security Considerations
This extension is intended to improve the flexibility of client
authentication policies in TLS. However, because it introduces
unauthenticated identity hints early in the handshake, several
security considerations apply.
4.1. Confidentiality of Workload Identifier Origins
Workload identifier origins may contain sensitive information, such
as deployment structure or tenant-specific data. Since this
extension is sent in the clear as part of the ClientHello, exposure
of these identifier origins may allow passive observers to infer
client roles, access patterns, or security posture.
To mitigate this risk, clients SHOULD include this extension only in
ClinetHelloInner if [ECH] is available. ECH encrypts the
ClinetHelloInner and its extensions under the server's public key,
preventing visibility of the identifier origins to on-path observers.
If ECH is not in use, clients SHOULD avoid including sensitive or
detailed identifier origins in this extension unless required by
policy.
4.2. Unauthenticated Hints
The workload identifier origins conveyed in this extension are not
authenticated. They are advisory in nature and MUST NOT be treated
by the server as a proof of identity. Servers MUST perform full
cryptographic verification of the client certificate before relying
on any identity claim.
Rosomakho & Hoyland Expires 3 September 2026 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft Workload Identifier Origin Hint for TLS March 2026
Servers MAY enforce policies based on the presence or absence of
expected identifier origins in the ClientHello. However, this
enforcement must be restricted to access control decisions prior to
authentication, such astriggering client authentication or rejecting
the handshake.
4.3. Identifier Origins Enumeration
If ECH is not deployed, an attacker with network visibility may
collect workload identifier origins by observing repeated TLS
handshakes. This could aid in reconnaissance or allow inference of
infrastructure details. To reduce this risk, clients may:
* Use generic or opaque identifier origins when full disclosure is
not required.
* Limit use of the extension to trusted networks or peers.
* Use ECH to encrypt the extension contents.
4.4. Server Response Behaviour
Servers receiving unknown or malformed identifier origins SHOULD
ignore them and proceed with the default authentication policy.
Servers SHOULD NOT terminate connections solely due to unrecognised
identifier origins unless explicitly configured to do so.
5. IANA Considerations
IANA is requested to assign a new value from the TLS ExtensionType
Values registry:
* The Extension Name should be workload_identifier_origin_hint
* The TLS 1.3 value should be CH
* The DTLS-Only value should be N
* The Recommended value should be Y
* The Reference should be this document
6. Normative References
Rosomakho & Hoyland Expires 3 September 2026 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft Workload Identifier Origin Hint for TLS March 2026
[ECH] Rescorla, E., Oku, K., Sullivan, N., and C. A. Wood, "TLS
Encrypted Client Hello", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft,
draft-ietf-tls-esni-25, 14 June 2025,
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-tls-
esni-25>.
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2119>.
[RFC8174] Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC
2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174,
May 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8174>.
[TLS] Rescorla, E., "The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol
Version 1.3", RFC 8446, DOI 10.17487/RFC8446, August 2018,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8446>.
[URI] Berners-Lee, T., Fielding, R., and L. Masinter, "Uniform
Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax", STD 66,
RFC 3986, DOI 10.17487/RFC3986, January 2005,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3986>.
[WIMSE-IDENTIFIER]
Rosomakho, Y. and J. A. Salowey, "Workload Identifier",
Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-wimse-
identifier-02, 2 March 2026,
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-wimse-
identifier-02>.
Acknowledgments
TODO acknowledge.
Authors' Addresses
Yaroslav Rosomakho
Zscaler
Email: yrosomakho@zscaler.com
Jonathan Hoyland
Cloudflare
Email: jonathan.hoyland@gmail.com
Rosomakho & Hoyland Expires 3 September 2026 [Page 7]