URL Problem Statement and Directions
draft-ruby-url-problem-01

Document Type Expired Internet-Draft (individual)
Last updated 2015-07-20 (latest revision 2015-01-11)
Stream (None)
Intended RFC status (None)
Formats
Expired & archived
plain text pdf html bibtex
Stream Stream state (No stream defined)
Consensus Boilerplate Unknown
RFC Editor Note (None)
IESG IESG state Expired
Telechat date
Responsible AD (None)
Send notices to (None)

This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft can be found at
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ruby-url-problem-01.txt

Abstract

This document lays out the problem space of possibly conflicting standards between multiple organizations for URLs and things like them, and proposes some actions to resolve the conflicts. From a user or developer point of view, it makes no sense for there to be a proliferation of definitions of URL nor for there to be a proliferation of incompatible implementations. This shouldn't be a competitive feature. Therefore there is a need for the organizations involved to update and reconcile the various Internet Drafts, Recommendations, and Standards in this area.

Authors

Sam Ruby (rubys@intertwingly.net)
Larry Masinter (masinter@adobe.com)

(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)