Skip to main content

Additional Authentication Method Reference Values
draft-skyfire-oauth-amr-values-00

Document Type Active Internet-Draft (individual)
Authors Ankit Agarwal , Michael B. Jones
Last updated 2026-07-06
RFC stream (None)
Intended RFC status (None)
Formats
Stream Stream state (No stream defined)
Consensus boilerplate Unknown
RFC Editor Note (None)
IESG IESG state I-D Exists
Telechat date (None)
Responsible AD (None)
Send notices to (None)
draft-skyfire-oauth-amr-values-00
Network Working Group                                         A. Agarwal
Internet-Draft                                      Skyfire Systems Inc.
Intended status: Standards Track                                M. Jones
Expires: 7 January 2027                           Self-Issued Consulting
                                                             6 July 2026

           Additional Authentication Method Reference Values
                   draft-skyfire-oauth-amr-values-00

Abstract

   The JWT "amr" (Authentication Methods References) claim contains
   values conveying authentication methods used in the authentication.
   This specification defines additional Authentication Method Reference
   values beyond those already registered to represent additional
   authentication methods in use today.

About This Document

   This note is to be removed before publishing as an RFC.

   The latest revision of this draft can be found at https://skyfire-
   xyz.github.io/draft-skyfire-oauth-amr-values/draft-skyfire-oauth-amr-
   values.html.  Status information for this document may be found at
   https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-skyfire-oauth-amr-values/.

   Source for this draft and an issue tracker can be found at
   https://github.com/skyfire-xyz/draft-skyfire-oauth-amr-values.

Status of This Memo

   This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
   provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF).  Note that other groups may also distribute
   working documents as Internet-Drafts.  The list of current Internet-
   Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   This Internet-Draft will expire on 7 January 2027.

Agarwal & Jones          Expires 7 January 2027                 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft            Additional AMR Values                July 2026

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2026 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/
   license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document.
   Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights
   and restrictions with respect to this document.  Code Components
   extracted from this document must include Revised BSD License text as
   described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are
   provided without warranty as described in the Revised BSD License.

Table of Contents

   1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
   2.  Conventions and Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
   3.  Authentication Method Reference Values  . . . . . . . . . . .   3
     3.1.  "app" (Authenticator App) Method  . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
     3.2.  "inp" (In-person Authentication) Method . . . . . . . . .   3
     3.3.  "vid" (Video Authentication) Method . . . . . . . . . . .   3
     3.4.  "bg" (Background Authentication) Method . . . . . . . . .   3
     3.5.  "email" (Code or link sent to e-mail) Method  . . . . . .   3
     3.6.  "push" (Push notification to mobile phone) Method . . . .   4
   4.  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
   5.  Privacy Considerations  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
   6.  IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
     6.1.  Authentication Method References Registry . . . . . . . .   4
       6.1.1.  "app" Method  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
       6.1.2.  "inp" Method  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
       6.1.3.  "vid" Method  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
       6.1.4.  "bg" Method . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
       6.1.5.  "email" Method  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
       6.1.6.  "push" Method . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
   7.  References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
     7.1.  Normative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
     7.2.  Informative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
   Document History  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
   Authors' Addresses  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6

1.  Introduction

   The JWT [RFC7519] "amr" (Authentication Methods References) claim
   [OpenID.Core] contains values conveying authentication methods used
   in the authentication.  They are registered in the IANA
   "Authentication Method Reference Values" registry [IANA.AMR].

Agarwal & Jones          Expires 7 January 2027                 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft            Additional AMR Values                July 2026

   Since the Authentication Method Reference Values [RFC8176]
   specification was published, several new authentication methods have
   been developed and/or come into widespread use.  This specification
   defines additional Authentication Method Reference values to
   represent these additional authentication methods in use today.

   While these Authentication Method Reference values are general
   purpose and can be used in any JSON Web Token (JWT) [RFC7519], one
   use case for them is use in KYAPay tokens
   [I-D.skyfire-oauth-kyapay-token].

2.  Conventions and Definitions

   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
   "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in
   BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all
   capitals, as shown here.

3.  Authentication Method Reference Values

   The following Authentication Method Reference values are defined by
   this specification:

3.1.  "app" (Authenticator App) Method

   app:  Authenticator App (e.g., Okta Verify, Google Authenticator,
      Microsoft Authenticator)

3.2.  "inp" (In-person Authentication) Method

   inp:  In-person Authentication

3.3.  "vid" (Video Authentication) Method

   vid:  Video Authentication (live video interview)

3.4.  "bg" (Background Authentication) Method

   bg:  Background Authentication (Silent network authentication of
      phone number, device recognition, geo-location, etc.)

3.5.  "email" (Code or link sent to e-mail) Method

   email:  Use of code or link sent to e-mail

Agarwal & Jones          Expires 7 January 2027                 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft            Additional AMR Values                July 2026

3.6.  "push" (Push notification to mobile phone) Method

   push:  Push notification to mobile phone

4.  Security Considerations

   The security considerations defined in Authentication Method
   Reference Values [RFC8176] apply to this specification.

5.  Privacy Considerations

   The privacy considerations defined in Authentication Method Reference
   Values [RFC8176] apply to this specification.

6.  IANA Considerations

6.1.  Authentication Method References Registry

   This specification registers the following Authentication Method
   Reference values in the IANA "Authentication Method Reference Values"
   registry [IANA.AMR] established by [RFC8176].

6.1.1.  "app" Method

   *  Authentication Method Reference Name: app

   *  Authentication Method Reference Description: Authenticator App

   *  Change Controller: IETF

   *  Specification Document(s): (#appMethod) of this specification

6.1.2.  "inp" Method

   *  Authentication Method Reference Name: inp

   *  Authentication Method Reference Description: In-person
      Authentication

   *  Change Controller: IETF

   *  Specification Document(s): (#inpMethod) of this specification

6.1.3.  "vid" Method

   *  Authentication Method Reference Name: vid

   *  Authentication Method Reference Description: Video Authentication

Agarwal & Jones          Expires 7 January 2027                 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft            Additional AMR Values                July 2026

   *  Change Controller: IETF

   *  Specification Document(s): (#vidMethod) of this specification

6.1.4.  "bg" Method

   *  Authentication Method Reference Name: bg

   *  Authentication Method Reference Description: Background
      Authentication

   *  Change Controller: IETF

   *  Specification Document(s): (#bgMethod) of this specification

6.1.5.  "email" Method

   *  Authentication Method Reference Name: email

   *  Authentication Method Reference Description: Code or link sent to
      e-mail

   *  Change Controller: IETF

   *  Specification Document(s): (#emailMethod) of this specification

6.1.6.  "push" Method

   *  Authentication Method Reference Name: push

   *  Authentication Method Reference Description: Push notification to
      mobile phone

   *  Change Controller: IETF

   *  Specification Document(s): (#pushMethod) of this specification

7.  References

7.1.  Normative References

   [RFC2119]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
              Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
              DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2119>.

Agarwal & Jones          Expires 7 January 2027                 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft            Additional AMR Values                July 2026

   [RFC8174]  Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC
              2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174,
              May 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8174>.

   [RFC8176]  Jones, M., Hunt, P., and A. Nadalin, "Authentication
              Method Reference Values", RFC 8176, DOI 10.17487/RFC8176,
              June 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8176>.

7.2.  Informative References

   [I-D.skyfire-oauth-kyapay-token]
              Agarwal, A. and M. B. Jones, "KYAPay Token", Work in
              Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-skyfire-oauth-kyapay-
              token-00, 5 July 2026,
              <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-skyfire-
              oauth-kyapay-token-00>.

   [IANA.AMR] IANA, "Authentication Method Reference Values", n.d.,
              <https://www.iana.org/assignments/authentication-method-
              reference-values>.

   [OpenID.Core]
              Sakimura, N., Bradley, J., Jones, M. B., Medeiros, B. de.,
              and C. Mortimore, "OpenID Connect Core 1.0 incorporating
              errata set 2", 15 December 2023,
              <https://openid.net/specs/openid-connect-core-1_0.html>.

   [RFC7519]  Jones, M., Bradley, J., and N. Sakimura, "JSON Web Token
              (JWT)", RFC 7519, DOI 10.17487/RFC7519, May 2015,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7519>.

Document History

   [[ to be removed by the RFC Editor before publication as an RFC ]]

   -00

   *  Initial draft.

Authors' Addresses

   Ankit Agarwal
   Skyfire Systems Inc.
   Email: ankit_agarwal@yahoo.com
   URI:   https://skyfire.xyz

Agarwal & Jones          Expires 7 January 2027                 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft            Additional AMR Values                July 2026

   Michael B. Jones
   Self-Issued Consulting
   Email: michael_b_jones@hotmail.com
   URI:   https://self-issued.info/

Agarwal & Jones          Expires 7 January 2027                 [Page 7]