api-catalog: A well-known URI to help discovery of APIs
draft-smith-api-catalog-01
This document is an Internet-Draft (I-D).
Anyone may submit an I-D to the IETF.
This I-D is not endorsed by the IETF and has no formal standing in the
IETF standards process.
The information below is for an old version of the document.
| Document | Type |
This is an older version of an Internet-Draft whose latest revision state is "Replaced".
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Author | Kevin Smith | ||
| Last updated | 2023-05-12 (Latest revision 2023-05-04) | ||
| Replaced by | draft-ietf-httpapi-api-catalog, draft-ietf-httpapi-api-catalog | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | I-D Exists | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
draft-smith-api-catalog-01
Internet Engineering Task Force K. Smith, Ed.
Internet-Draft Vodafone
Intended status: Standards Track 12 May 2023
Expires: 13 November 2023
api-catalog: A well-known URI to help discovery of APIs
draft-smith-api-catalog-01
Abstract
This document defines the "api-catalog" well-known URI. It is
intended to facilitate discovery of the APIs published by a Web host.
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on 13 November 2023.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2023 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/
license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document.
Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights
and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components
extracted from this document must include Revised BSD License text as
described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are
provided without warranty as described in the Revised BSD License.
Smith Expires 13 November 2023 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft api-catalog May 2023
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1.1. Goals and non-goals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1.2. Requirements Language . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2. Using the 'api-catalog' well-known URI . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3. Associated Media type: the api-catalog linkset . . . . . . . 3
4. Link relations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
5. Conformance to RFC8615 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
5.1. Path prefix . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
5.2. Supported URI schemes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
5.3. Registration of the api-catalog well-known URI . . . . . 5
6. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
6.1. The api-catalog well-known URI . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
6.2. The api-catalog link relation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
6.3. The api-portal link relation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
7. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
8. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
8.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
8.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
Author's Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
1. Introduction
A Web host may publish Application Programming Interfaces (APIs) to
encourage requests for interaction from external parties. Such APIs
must be discovered before they may be used - i.e., the external party
needs to know what APIs a given Web host exposes, including their
purpose, any constraints to use, and the endpoints to interact with
the APIs. To faciliate discovery of this information, this document
proposes a well-known URI, 'api-catalog', as a location where a Web
host's API endpoints are listed and described.
1.1. Goals and non-goals
The primary goal is to facilitate the discovery of both a Web Host's
public API endpoints, and metadata that informs the potential API
client of the purpose of each API and any constraints around usage.
Non-goals: this document does not mandate paths for API endpoints.
i.e., it does not mandate that my_example_api should be available at
example.com/.well-known/api-catalog/my_example_api (although it is
not forbidden to do so).
Smith Expires 13 November 2023 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft api-catalog May 2023
1.2. Requirements Language
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
"OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP
14 [RFC2119] when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as
shown here.
2. Using the 'api-catalog' well-known URI
The api-catalog well-known URI is intended for HTTP(S) servers that
publish APIs and wish to facilitate their discovery. Since the
purpose of the api-catalog well-known URI is to facilitate API
discovery with minimal prior knowledge, it is recommended that
/.well-known/api-catalog be hosted at a predictable hostname, i.e.
www.example.com . It may also be hosted at other hostnames, e.g.
api.example.com, developer.example.com etc.
A Web host (example.com) supporting this URI:
* SHALL resolve an HTTP(S) GET request to /.well-known/api-catalog
and return a list of public APIs.
* SHOULD resolve an HTTP(S) HEAD request to /.well-known/api-catalog
with a response including a Link header with the relation(s)
defined in Section 4.
3. Associated Media type: the api-catalog linkset
A request to the api-catalog well-known URI is expected to return a
set of one or more links, each labelled with a link relation to allow
machines and humans to decide if, and understand why, to follow them.
The api-catalog is recommended to consist of:
* link(s) to the API gateway(s), or portal(s), of the Web Host, that
present a public Web page with details of APIs offered,
documentation, Ts & Cs etc.
* links to each API offered by the Web Host. Ideally each of these
links will be to an API bookmark, which, if followed, will provide
further links with information on API endpoints, operations,
versions, documentation etc.
[RFC9264] defines the application/linkset+json JSON document format
for link sets, and is used for the following example:
Smith Expires 13 November 2023 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft api-catalog May 2023
{ "linkset":
[
{ "anchor": "https://example.com/",
"api-portal": [
{"href": "https://developer.example.com/my_portal"}
]
},
{ "anchor": "https://example.com/,
"https://example.com/relations/api1" : [
{"href": "https://developer.example.com/apis/api1"}
]
},
{ "anchor": "https://example.com/,
"https://example.com/relations/api2" : [
{"href": "https://developer.example.com/apis/api2"}
]
},
{ "anchor": "https://example.com/,
"https://some_standards_org.example.com/relations/some_api" : [
{"href": "https://developer.example.com/apis/api3"}
]
},
]
}
Figure 1: api-catalog linkset example
4. Link relations
(Editor's note: TODO. Suggested are: "api-catalog", and also "api-
portal" because it seems likely many implementers will have such a
portal, hence it makes sense to make that common. The APIs
themselves are less likely to be common across implementers and
should use extensible link relations, providing a URI to their
definition. This also applies if the API being linked to is based on
a standard, in which case the standard body in question should
declare the URI for the extensible link relation definition, e.g.
https://some_standards_org.example.com/relations/some_api , and this
can be used by all implementing hosts of that API)
5. Conformance to RFC8615
The requirements in section 3 of [RFC8615] for defining Well-Known
Uniform Resource Identifiers are met as follows:
Smith Expires 13 November 2023 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft api-catalog May 2023
5.1. Path prefix
The api-catalog URI SHALL be appended to the /.well-known/ path-
prefix for "well-known locations".
5.2. Supported URI schemes
The api-catalog well-known URI may be used with the HTTP and HTTPS
URI schemes.
5.3. Registration of the api-catalog well-known URI
See Section 6 considerations below.
6. IANA Considerations
6.1. The api-catalog well-known URI
This specification registers the "api-catalog" well-known URI in the
Well-Known URI Registry as defined by [RFC6415] .
URI suffix: api-catalog
Specification document(s): draft-smith-api-catalog-01
Related information: The "api-catalog" documents obtained from the
same host using the HTTP and HTTPS protocols (using default ports)
MUST be identical.
6.2. The api-catalog link relation
This specification registers the "api-catalog" link relation by
following the procedures per section 4.2.2 of [RFC8288] (Editor's
note: this is TODO).
6.3. The api-portal link relation
(Editor's note: if the suggestion above to include this is agreed).
7. Security Considerations
TBD
8. References
8.1. Normative References
Smith Expires 13 November 2023 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft api-catalog May 2023
[RFC6415] Hammer-Lahav, E., Ed. and B. Cook, "Web Host Metadata",
RFC 6415, DOI 10.17487/RFC6415, October 2011,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6415>.
[RFC8288] Nottingham, M., "Web Linking", RFC 8288,
DOI 10.17487/RFC8288, October 2017,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8288>.
[RFC8615] Nottingham, M., "Well-Known Uniform Resource Identifiers
(URIs)", RFC 8615, DOI 10.17487/RFC8615, May 2019,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8615>.
[RFC9264] Wilde, E. and H. Van de Sompel, "Linkset: Media Types and
a Link Relation Type for Link Sets", RFC 9264,
DOI 10.17487/RFC9264, July 2022,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9264>.
8.2. Informative References
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.
Acknowledgements
TODO
Author's Address
Kevin Smith (editor)
Vodafone
One Kingdom Street
London
W2 6BY
United Kingdom
Email: kevin.smith@vodafone.com
URI: www.vodafone.com
Smith Expires 13 November 2023 [Page 6]