Postcard-based On-Path Flow Data Telemetry
draft-song-ippm-postcard-based-telemetry-03

• Status
• IESG evaluation record
• IESG writeups
• Email expansions
• History

• Versions
• 00
• 01
• 02
• 03

IPPM                                                        H. Song, Ed.
Internet-Draft                                                   T. Zhou
Intended status: Standards Track                                   Z. Li
Expires: October 24, 2019                                         Huawei
                                                                 J. Shin
                                                              SK Telecom
                                                          April 22, 2019

               Postcard-based On-Path Flow Data Telemetry
              draft-song-ippm-postcard-based-telemetry-03

Abstract

   The Postcard-Based Telemetry (PBT) allows network OAM applications to
   collect telemetry data about any user packet.  Unlike the E2E and
   trace modes in in-situ OAM (IOAM), PBT does not require user packets
   to carry any telemetry data, but directly exports the telemetry data
   from network nodes to a collector through separated OAM packets
   called postcards.  Two variations of PBT, PBT-I and PBT-M, are
   described.  PBT-I requires inserting an instruction header to user
   packets to guide the data collection.  PBT-I is designed as another
   mode of IOAM, Per-Hop Postcard (PHP), to complement the existing
   operational modes of IOAM.  PBT-M only marks the user packets or
   configure the flow filter to invoke the data collection.  PBT-M also
   provides a complement to IOAM and address several implementation and
   deployment challenges of it.

Status of This Memo

   This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
   provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF).  Note that other groups may also distribute
   working documents as Internet-Drafts.  The list of current Internet-
   Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   This Internet-Draft will expire on October 24, 2019.

Song, et al.            Expires October 24, 2019                [Page 1]
Internet-Draft          Postcard-Based Telemetry              April 2019

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2019 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
   (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
   publication of this document.  Please review these documents
   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
   to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
   include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
   the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
   described in the Simplified BSD License.

Table of Contents

   1.  Motivation  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
   2.  PBT-M: Postcard-based Telemetry with Packet Marking . . . . .   5
     2.1.  New Requirements  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
     2.2.  Solution Description  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
     2.3.  New Challenges  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   7
     2.4.  Considerations on PBT-M Design  . . . . . . . . . . . . .   8
       2.4.1.  Packet Marking  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   8
       2.4.2.  Flow Path Discovery . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   8
       2.4.3.  Packet Identity for Export Data Correlation . . . . .   9
     2.5.  Avoid Packet Marking through Node Configuration . . . . .   9
   3.  PBT-I: Postcard-based Telemetry with Instruction Header . . .  10
     3.1.  Solution Description  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  11
     3.2.  PHP Header  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  12
   4.  Postcard Format . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  13
   5.  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  13
   6.  IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  13
   7.  Contributors  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  13
   8.  Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  13
   9.  Informative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  14
   Authors' Addresses  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  17

1.  Motivation

   In order to gain detailed data plane visibility to support effective
   network OAM, it is important to be able to examine the trace of user
   packets along their forwarding paths.  Such on-path flow data reflect
   the state and status of each user packet's real-time experience and
   provide valuable information for network monitoring, measurement, and
   diagnosis.

Song, et al.            Expires October 24, 2019                [Page 2]