Post-quantum cryptography migration use cases
draft-vaira-pquip-pqc-use-cases-02
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Antonio Vaira , Hendrik Brockhaus , Alexander Railean , John Gray , Mike Ounsworth | ||
| Last updated | 2025-01-09 (Latest revision 2024-07-08) | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Additional resources |
GitHub Repository
|
||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
This document is meant to be continuously updated, to incorporate emerging Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC) migration use cases, with a focus on the migration from traditional signature algorithms (e.g., RSA, DSA, ECDSA) to PQC signature algorithms (e.g., LMS, XMSS, ML- DSA, SLH-DSA). This document aims at categorizing real-world scenarios based on a set of distinctive features. The primary goal is to facilitate discussions on migration strategies by offering a systematic taxonomy and a shared understanding among stakeholders.
Authors
Antonio Vaira
Hendrik Brockhaus
Alexander Railean
John Gray
Mike Ounsworth
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)