IPv6 Deployment Status
draft-vf-v6ops-ipv6-deployment-02
| Document | Type |
Replaced Internet-Draft
(v6ops WG)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Giuseppe Fioccola , Paolo Volpato , Nalini Elkins , Sebastien Lourdez | ||
| Last updated | 2021-04-06 (Latest revision 2021-02-22) | ||
| Replaced by | draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-deployment | ||
| RFC stream | Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Additional resources | Mailing list discussion | ||
| Stream | WG state | Candidate for WG Adoption | |
| Document shepherd | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Replaced by draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-deployment | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
Looking globally, IPv6 is growing faster than IPv4 and this means that the collective wisdom of the networking industry has selected IPv6 for the future. This document provides an overview of IPv6 transition deployment status and a view on how the transition to IPv6 is progressing among network operators and enterprises that are introducing IPv6 or have already adopted an IPv6-only solution. It also aims to analyze the transition challenges and therefore encourage actions and more investigations on some areas that are still under discussion. The overall IPv6 incentives are also examined.
Authors
Giuseppe Fioccola
Paolo Volpato
Nalini Elkins
Sebastien Lourdez
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)