AID-1 Provider-Independent Conformance Requirements and Test-Vector Model
draft-watts-ai-identity-conformance-00
This document is an Internet-Draft (I-D).
Anyone may submit an I-D to the IETF.
This I-D is not endorsed by the IETF and has no formal standing in the
IETF standards process.
| Document | Type | Active Internet-Draft (individual) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Author | Deonté Watts | ||
| Last updated | 2026-09-01 | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | I-D Exists | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
draft-watts-ai-identity-conformance-00
Internet Engineering Task Force D. Watts
Internet-Draft Independent Researcher
Intended status: Informational September 2026
Expires: 5 March 2027
AID-1 Provider-Independent Conformance Requirements and Test-Vector
Model
draft-watts-ai-identity-conformance-00
Abstract
This document defines provider-independent conformance requirements
for AID-1. It specifies the execution model for a deterministic
machine-readable test-vector corpus, including canonicalization,
cryptographic, identity-binding, delegation, authorization, temporal,
revocation, replay, attestation, provenance, and integration cases.
The conformance corpus contains 69 vectors. Six replay cases are
architectural boundary tests, including R5, which requires AID-1
verification to succeed while a downstream D6 scientific-
admissibility decision rejects the same evidence.
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on 5 March 2027.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2026 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/
license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document.
Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights
Watts Expires 5 March 2027 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft AID-1-TEST September 2026
and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components
extracted from this document must include Revised BSD License text as
described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are
provided without warranty as described in the Revised BSD License.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
2. Conformance Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
3. Machine-Readable Corpus . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
4. Vector Execution Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
5. Expected Outcomes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
6. Required Coverage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
7. Replay and Architectural Boundary Cases . . . . . . . . . . . 5
7.1. R5: AID-1 Valid, D6 Reject . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
8. Provider Independence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
9. Reference Vector Runner . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
10. Release Gates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
11. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
12. Privacy Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
13. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
14. Publication and Versioning . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
15. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
Author's Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
1. Introduction
AID-1 is intentionally independent of software-only, TPM, TEE, HSM,
enclave, cloud, or other implementation providers. Conformance
therefore depends on observable verification behavior rather than
implementation mechanism.
This document defines the semantic contract for the AID-1-TEST
machine-readable corpus and its reference vector runner.
2. Conformance Requirements
An implementation claiming conformance to AID-1 MUST execute the
complete required vector corpus and MUST produce the expected outcome
for every required vector.
The provider under test MUST NOT receive privileged knowledge of the
expected result beyond the ordinary input data supplied to an AID-1
verifier.
The same vector corpus MUST be usable without semantic modification
against SoftwareProvider, MockTPMProvider, MockTEEProvider, and
future provider implementations.
Watts Expires 5 March 2027 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft AID-1-TEST September 2026
3. Machine-Readable Corpus
The AID-1-TEST v1 corpus contains 69 deterministic vectors. Each
vector SHOULD contain, directly or by stable reference, a base
fixture, mutation or transformation, expected verification outcome,
expected failure codes where applicable, and any downstream boundary
expectations.
aid-1-test-vectors/
manifest.json
schema/
vector.schema.json
manifest.schema.json
fixtures/
identities/
keys/
delegations/
authorizations/
attestations/
provenance/
vectors/
schema/
canonicalization/
crypto/
identity/
delegation/
authorization/
temporal/
revocation/
replay/
attestation/
provenance/
integration/
replay/
R1.json
R2.json
R3.json
R4.json
R5.json
R6.json
The machine-readable corpus is the executable test artifact. This
document specifies the semantics required for interpreting that
corpus.
Watts Expires 5 March 2027 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft AID-1-TEST September 2026
4. Vector Execution Model
A reference runner SHOULD evaluate each vector using the following
conceptual process:
base fixture
+
specified mutation
|
v
deterministic candidate object
|
v
AID-1 verifier
|
v
actual decision
|
v
expected decision
|
v
PASS / FAIL
A mutation MUST be deterministic. A runner MUST NOT modify fields
that are outside the mutation specified by the vector.
5. Expected Outcomes
A vector MAY expect ALLOW, DENY, or INDETERMINATE. A vector MAY also
expect one or more standardized failure codes.
INDETERMINATE MUST NOT be treated as equivalent to ALLOW for
conformance purposes.
6. Required Coverage
The corpus MUST include vectors covering at least:
* JCS canonicalization and rejection of unsupported values;
* Ed25519 positive and negative signature verification;
* tampered-envelope rejection;
* key-substitution rejection;
* identity binding independent from a self-supplied key;
Watts Expires 5 March 2027 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft AID-1-TEST September 2026
* capability, resource, state, time, and delegation enforcement;
* revoked and unavailable revocation states;
* duplicate nonce and action replay;
* forged or untrusted external attestation;
* key rotation, overlap, supersession, and historical validity;
* audit-chain deletion, reordering, and mutation detection; and
* confused-deputy, audience-confusion, cross-repository replay,
delegation-escalation, and stale-credential cases.
7. Replay and Architectural Boundary Cases
Six replay cases, R1 through R6, are reserved as architecture-level
conformance cases. These cases are intended to detect accidental
collapse of trust domains across implementations.
7.1. R5: AID-1 Valid, D6 Reject
R5 is a mandatory conformance invariant.
AID-1 verification: VALID
D6 scientific-admissibility decision: REJECT
An implementation MUST pass R5 by preserving the distinction between
AID-1 identity/provenance verification and downstream scientific
admissibility.
A provider or integration that automatically converts successful
AID-1 verification into downstream D6 acceptance is non-conformant.
8. Provider Independence
A provider implementation MAY use software keys, TPM-backed keys,
TEE-backed keys, HSMs, secure enclaves, or future mechanisms. The
provider MUST expose behavior compatible with the AID-1 verifier and
MUST preserve the same externally observable decision semantics.
Provider-specific implementation details MUST NOT alter the expected
outcome of any provider-independent vector.
Watts Expires 5 March 2027 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft AID-1-TEST September 2026
9. Reference Vector Runner
The reference runner SHOULD load the corpus manifest, validate each
vector against its schema, construct the candidate object, execute
the AID-1 verifier, compare actual and expected outcomes, and emit a
deterministic report.
The reference runner SHOULD report at least the vector identifier,
actual decision, expected decision, observed failure codes, expected
failure codes, and PASS or FAIL status.
10. Release Gates
An implementation MUST NOT claim completion of the AID-1 v1 security
conformance profile until the required gates pass. These gates
include:
1. JCS conformance and rejection tests;
2. Ed25519 positive, negative, tampered-envelope, and key-
substitution vectors;
3. identity-binding separation from self-supplied key material;
4. independent authorization checks for capability, resource,
state, time, and delegation;
5. revocation and unavailable-registry handling;
6. replay resistance;
7. external attestation verification;
8. rotation and historical-verification behavior;
9. audit-integrity checks; and
10. adversarial trust-boundary vectors.
11. Security Considerations
A conformance suite is security-sensitive because a weak oracle can
certify incorrect behavior. The corpus, manifest, schemas, and
runner SHOULD therefore be content-addressed or otherwise integrity
protected.
Watts Expires 5 March 2027 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft AID-1-TEST September 2026
Test providers MUST NOT be permitted to alter vector expectations
during execution. CI systems SHOULD pin the corpus revision used for
a conformance claim.
12. Privacy Considerations
Conformance fixtures SHOULD use synthetic identities, synthetic
credentials, and non-production attestation material unless a test
explicitly requires otherwise. Real personal credentials, production
secrets, and live private keys MUST NOT be distributed in the public
corpus.
13. IANA Considerations
This document requests no IANA actions.
14. Publication and Versioning
The 69-vector corpus SHOULD be versioned independently but SHOULD
declare the AID-1 specification revision against which it is
evaluated. Published conformance reports SHOULD identify both the
corpus revision and the implementation revision.
15. Normative References
[AID1] Watts, D., "AID-1: A Cryptographically Bindable Identity
and Provenance Architecture for AI Systems", Work in
Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-watts-ai-identity-00,
September 2026, <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/
draft-watts-ai-identity-00>.
[RFC8785] Rundgren, A., Jordan, B., and S. Erdtman, "JSON
Canonicalization Scheme (JCS)", RFC 8785, June 2020,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8785>.
Author's Address
Deonte Watts
Independent Researcher
Email: deonte@goodshyt.fun
URI: https://orcid.org/0009-0005-8586-3650
Watts Expires 5 March 2027 [Page 7]