Skip to main content

UDP Speedy Secure Shell (USSH)
draft-x1co-ussh-01

The information below is for an old version of the document.
Document Type
This is an older version of an Internet-Draft whose latest revision state is "Active".
Author x1co!
Last updated 2026-06-12 (Latest revision 2026-06-07)
RFC stream (None)
Formats
Stream Stream state (No stream defined)
Consensus boilerplate Unknown
RFC Editor Note (None)
IESG IESG state I-D Exists
Telechat date (None)
Responsible AD (None)
Send notices to (None)
draft-x1co-ussh-01
Independent Submission                                           X. x1co
Internet-Draft                                                 x1colegal
Intended status: Experimental                               12 June 2026
Expires: 14 December 2026

                     UDP Speedy Secure Shell (USSH)
                           draft-x1co-ussh-01

Abstract

   This document describes UDP Speedy Secure Shell (USSH), an
   experimental remote shell protocol built on top of USTPS.  USSH
   provides an interactive shell session over a secure UDP-based
   transport while preserving USTPS transport semantics, including
   challenge-validated session setup, per-session key establishment,
   selective retransmission, and support for session recovery when the
   client changes networks.

Status of This Memo

   This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
   provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF).  Note that other groups may also distribute
   working documents as Internet-Drafts.  The list of current Internet-
   Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   This Internet-Draft will expire on 14 December 2026.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2026 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/
   license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document.
   Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights
   and restrictions with respect to this document.

x1co                    Expires 14 December 2026                [Page 1]
Internet-Draft                    USSH                         June 2026

Table of Contents

   1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
   2.  Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
   3.  Relationship to USTPS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
   4.  Session Establishment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
   5.  Message Identification  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
   6.  Protocol Model  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
   7.  Interactive Stream Handling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
   8.  Head-of-Line Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
   9.  Network Change Recovery . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
   10. Security Model  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
   11. Operational Status  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
   12. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
   13. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
   14. Normative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
   15. Informative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
   Author's Address  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5

1.  Introduction

   USSH is an experimental secure shell protocol built directly on top
   of USTPS rather than on TCP.  Its goal is to provide interactive
   remote shell access while preserving the properties of the underlying
   USTPS transport, including packet-level authenticated protection for
   DATA packets, per-client session keys, selective retransmission, and
   lack of transport-level Head-of-Line blocking.

   USSH is not intended to be wire-compatible with SSH.  It is a
   distinct protocol with its own packetization and control semantics.

2.  Terminology

   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
   "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP
   14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all
   capitals, as shown here.

3.  Relationship to USTPS

   USSH uses USTPS as its secure transport substrate.  The outer secure
   envelope and inner transport packet format are provided by USTPS.
   USSH then defines its own application messages for shell
   authentication, PTY setup, standard input delivery, standard output
   delivery, resize events, keepalives, and session termination.

x1co                    Expires 14 December 2026                [Page 2]
Internet-Draft                    USSH                         June 2026

   USTPS remains unordered at the transport layer.  USSH therefore
   performs application-layer reconstruction where terminal behavior
   requires ordered reconstruction of logical streams such as standard
   output.

4.  Session Establishment

   A USSH client first establishes a USTPS session with the server.  In
   current public implementations, this includes a plaintext HELLO, a
   plaintext challenge containing a token and generated Base64 session
   identifier, and a validated challenge response before DATA traffic is
   accepted.

   Only after the secure USTPS session exists does the client perform
   USSH authentication and request an interactive shell or PTY-backed
   session.

5.  Message Identification

   USSH application messages begin with the magic value USS1, meaning
   "UDP Speedy Secure Shell, version 1" in the USSH application context.

   In deployed implementations, the USTPS secure envelope also uses the
   identifier USS1 at the encrypted outer framing layer for DATA.  The
   inner USTPS transport packet uses UST1.  Implementers should
   therefore distinguish between the secure envelope, the USTPS
   transport packet, and the USSH application payload when analyzing
   packet captures or decrypted data.

6.  Protocol Model

   Current implementations support password-based authentication after
   the secure USTPS session is established.  Once authenticated, the
   server launches a PTY-backed shell on behalf of the client.

   USSH messages currently cover at least the following categories:

   *  Authentication and session setup

   *  Standard input delivery

   *  Standard output delivery

   *  Terminal resize events

   *  Keepalive and liveness signaling

   *  Session close and exit signaling

x1co                    Expires 14 December 2026                [Page 3]
Internet-Draft                    USSH                         June 2026

7.  Interactive Stream Handling

   Interactive shells are highly sensitive to stream corruption and
   terminal redraw behavior.  Although USTPS is unordered at the
   transport layer, a shell's logical input and output streams often
   require application-level ordering.  USSH therefore reconstructs
   ordered logical output where needed before presenting terminal bytes
   to the local client terminal.

   This reconstruction is an application-layer behavior of USSH.  It
   does not convert USTPS itself into an ordered transport.

8.  Head-of-Line Considerations

   USSH inherits the lack of transport-level Head-of-Line blocking from
   USTPS.  However, because terminal streams and PTY behavior often
   require coherent ordered interpretation, USSH may temporarily delay
   terminal-visible output while reconstructing the correct logical
   order of shell output fragments.

   That delay occurs at the application layer and is distinct from
   transport-level Head-of-Line blocking.

9.  Network Change Recovery

   USSH inherits path-recovery capability from USTPS.  If the client's
   active UDP path dies, the secure session may be resumed on a new path
   using the stored session identifier instead of immediately forcing a
   brand-new shell session.

   This behavior is intended to let a client change networks without
   automatically losing the interactive shell as soon as the previous
   UDP path breaks.

10.  Security Model

   USSH relies on USTPS for mandatory AEAD protection of DATA packets
   and per-client key establishment.  Current public implementations
   additionally support persistent server host keys, TOFU-based server
   identity continuity, and application-level authentication before
   granting shell access.

   Implementations SHOULD carefully protect shell spawn logic, PTY
   handling, session teardown, and terminal state restoration.  Clients
   SHOULD restore local terminal settings even when the session closes
   unexpectedly.

x1co                    Expires 14 December 2026                [Page 4]
Internet-Draft                    USSH                         June 2026

11.  Operational Status

   USSH has been implemented and exercised as a Beta-grade experimental
   protocol.  Public development has focused on stability over the USTPS
   substrate, interactive shell usability, session liveness, path
   recovery, and terminal negotiation.

12.  IANA Considerations

   This document has no IANA actions.

13.  Security Considerations

   Remote shell protocols expose high-impact capabilities.  In addition
   to the security requirements inherited from USTPS, USSH
   implementations MUST authenticate clients before granting shell
   access, MUST avoid leaking shell access to unauthenticated peers, and
   SHOULD defend against terminal-state corruption, stale-session reuse,
   and unauthorized session migration.

   Applications and operators should understand that USSH is
   experimental and not interchangeable with SSH security review,
   ecosystem hardening, or deployment maturity.

14.  Normative References

   [RFC2119]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
              Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.

   [RFC8174]  Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC
              2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, May 2017,
              <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>.

15.  Informative References

   [USTPS-DRAFT]
              x1co, X., "UDP Speedy Transmission Protocol Secure
              (USTPS)", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-x1co-
              ustps-02, June 2026,
              <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-x1co-ustps/>.

Author's Address

   x1co
   x1colegal
   Email: x1colegal@outlook.com.br

x1co                    Expires 14 December 2026                [Page 5]