Skip to main content

Minutes IETF122: pearg: Wed 08:30
minutes-122-pearg-202503190830-00

Meeting Minutes Privacy Enhancements and Assessments Research Group (pearg) RG
Date and time 2025-03-19 08:30
Title Minutes IETF122: pearg: Wed 08:30
State Active
Other versions markdown
Last updated 2025-03-28

minutes-122-pearg-202503190830-00

# Privacy Enhancements and Assessments Research Group (PEARG) Minutes -
IETF 122

  • Date: 2025-03-2025
  • Chair(s): Allison Mankin & Sara Dickinson
  • Notetaker(s): Saidu Sokoto

Authentication in MLS and Its Variants

Slides
Presenter: Keitaro Hashimoto
Topic: Exploring How to Authenticate Application Messages in MLS:
More Efficient, Post-Quantum, and Anonymous Blocklistable

Discussion & Questions

  • Guiin Wang: Why is this scheme considered anonymous if the
    receiver sees the second MAC?

    • Keitaro: The receiver needs to know the sender, so Y is
      pre-shared with group members.
  • Guiin Wang: Question unclear.

    • Keitaro: The token is only used once.
  • Richard Barnes: Trade-offs in the Cosmos variant—less data sent,
    but overhead in establishing one-time keys.

    • Keitaro: New tokens are attached to messages and sent when a
      sender sends a new message.
  • Q Miseli: Are fuzzy tags applicable to this scheme?

    • Keitaro: Discussion to be taken offline.

Guidelines for Performing Safe Measurements on the Internet

Speaker: Gurshabad Grover
Goal: Provide a brief on guidelines for conducting internet
measurements.

Key Points

  • Feedback on improving language to avoid negativity.
  • Suggestions to incorporate prior research on network measurements
    from beyond IETF.
  • Recent updates already reflect most feedback.
  • More feedback is welcome.

Future Directions for the Research Group

Key Considerations

  • Privacy landscape is evolving rapidly

    • Stability of internet infrastructure cannot be taken for granted
      (see WSIS+20).
    • UK Gov vs. Apple highlights real-world privacy-policy conflicts.
    • Post-quantum cryptography needs more focus.
  • Community input on future directions is welcome (in-meeting &
    mailing list).

Discussion

  • Nick Sullivan: Should censorship-related work be a research
    focus?

    • Chair: Some interest but mixed feedback. Within charter, but
      a separate group could also be an option.
  • Dirk: Open to exploring new topics for future meetings.

  • Nick Doty: Other relevant privacy areas:

    • Privacy-preserving techniques
    • Multi-party computation for telemetry
    • Human understanding of cryptographic protocols
    • Sara: These are valuable topics.
  • Alison:

    • Call for agenda items.
    • Possible longer meeting with open agenda for proposals.
    • Group’s focus is assessing protocols for real-world use.
  • Nick Doty: Should we engage more with IETF privacy review
    standards?

    • Alison: Open to contributing thoughts.
  • Sara: Past discussions about a privacy secretariat—unclear if
    interest remains.

  • Colin Perkins: IRTF cannot formally give unsolicited advice to
    IETF.
  • Jim Reid: DNS Directorate accepts proposals on DNS-related
    topics.
  • Tommy Pauly: How can research inform IETF privacy review?
    Possible outputs:

    • Identifying useful privacy requirements
    • Joint workshops
  • Sara: Retrospective analysis of privacy requirements could be
    useful.

  • Dirk Kutscher: The biggest challenge is having enough people to
    conduct reviews.

Next Steps:

  • Continue discussions on mailing list.
  • Gather input on future research topics.
  • Consider expanding focus on censorship, post-quantum, and IETF
    privacy engagement.