Minutes interim-2023-drip-03: Wed 14:00
minutes-interim-2023-drip-03-202306281400-00
| Meeting Minutes | Drone Remote ID Protocol (drip) WG | |
|---|---|---|
| Date and time | 2023-06-28 14:00 | |
| Title | Minutes interim-2023-drip-03: Wed 14:00 | |
| State | Active | |
| Other versions | markdown | |
| Last updated | 2023-06-28 |
==================================================================
Drone Remote ID Protocol (drip)
Interim Meeting Agenda
Wed, June 28, 2023
Co-Chairs: Daniel Migault & Mohamed Boucadair
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/interim-2023-drip-03/session/drip
present:
AD Éric V.
Chair Med B.
Chair Daniel M.
Adam W.
Stu C.
Edmund (part-time)
Jim Reid (part-time)
- Introduction & Agenda Bashing (5 min)
Med: future of working group? Energy to continue?
- drip-auth (10 min)
- Updates on the SAM registry
- Plan for a second WGLC (if the SAM issue is fixed)
AD: Explained the current plan for SAMs: Ask the LLC to request the
codes (copying the WG list) + request an IANA mirror page + update the
draft accordingly (with the code point values and pointing to the mirror
IANA page). He also hopes/expects to have an official reply from ASTM
about the outbound IETF Liaison Statement.
AW: the other code point is already assigned by ASTM. SAM codepoints,
once assigned by ICAO on behalf of ASTM, will be duplicate listed by
IANA.
- drip-registries (30 min)
- Update on the directorate reviews
- Pending issues
- Next steps
Jim R. reminded us we still confront issues re: IPv6 prefix allocation &
DNS reverse lookup apex zone delegation
Jim to send a message to the list. The AD will follow-up on the actions.
- Open Mic (15 min)
- Next meetings
- Future of the WG
SC: sad of non-critical mass of participants. ASTM shows extreme
interest (A2X work). FAA has shown interest (has seen many demos with AX
and NYUASTS). Two rounds was always expected.
Med: want to re-assess engagement before adopting more documents. needs
to find how to engage others. Try publishing in Internet Journals,
presentations?
EV: ASTM/ICAO appears to be very formal. Some IETF WGs only do remote
interim meetings (i.e., no fee). That may be a solution for more
participation.
AW: agree with all points.
SC: clarification - Bob asks for adoption but SC agrees with Med. But
repeated restructing of registries has made DKI somewhat a core document
so either pull back into registries or adopt. Not a great cheerleader or
recuiter. seek guidance and help to make more.
DM: people recruited are probably outside the IETF
SC: that maybe i can do, twist some arms.
EV: also extend into security part of IETF as well. originally was in
sec, then moved to int.