Skip to main content

Early Review of draft-deshpande-secevent-http-multi-set-push-00
review-deshpande-secevent-http-multi-set-push-00-genart-early-housley-2025-11-04-00

Request Review of draft-deshpande-secevent-http-multi-set-push
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 05)
Type Early Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2025-11-21
Requested 2025-10-31
Requested by Deb Cooley
Authors Apoorva Deshpande , Aaron Parecki
I-D last updated 2026-10-15 (Latest revision 2026-10-09)
Completed reviews Httpdir Early review of -00 by Darrel Miller (diff)
Genart Early review of -00 by Russ Housley (diff)
Secdir Early review of -00 by Scott G. Kelly (diff)
Secdir IETF Last Call review of -03 by Scott G. Kelly (diff)
Tsvart IETF Last Call review of -03 by Martin Duke (diff)
Httpdir Telechat review of -05 by Mark Nottingham
Assignment Reviewer Russ Housley
State Completed
Request Early review on draft-deshpande-secevent-http-multi-set-push by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/uhnJ18TFpHT1rhQAiKnraEa89uU
Reviewed revision 00 (document currently at 05)
Result Not ready
Completed 2025-11-04
review-deshpande-secevent-http-multi-set-push-00-genart-early-housley-2025-11-04-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at
<https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/gen/GenArtFAQ>.

Document: draft-deshpande-secevent-http-multi-set-push-00
Reviewer: Russ Housley
Review Date: 2025-11-04
IETF LC End Date: unknown
IESG Telechat date: unknown


Summary: Not Ready

Thanks for addressing my earlier comments on -08 of this document.


Major Concerns:

Section 4:  Is TLS mutual authentication needed?  What harm takes place
if mutual authentication is not employed?

Section 7: Some of the topics in the Security Considerations of RFC 8935
are not covered here. Is the intent to use TLS in lieu of the approach in
RFC 8935?  If so, please state that clearly.

In Section 7.3, please say more.  
  a) Are there any requirements for particular cipher suites?
  b) For implementations that support TLS 1.3, point to the
     Security Considerations of TLS 1.3; see [I-D.ietf-tls-rfc8446bis].


Minor Concerns:

Section 6 should be toward the front of the document.


Nits:

Please do not underline figure captions.  Example:

   _Figure 1: Example of SET Transmission_

Section 3.3: s/previously transmitted SETs/previously transmitted SETs./