Telechat Review of draft-hansen-scram-sha256-04
review-hansen-scram-sha256-04-secdir-telechat-roca-2015-09-03-00
| Request | Review of | draft-hansen-scram-sha256 |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 04) | |
| Type | Telechat Review | |
| Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
| Deadline | 2015-09-01 | |
| Requested | 2015-08-27 | |
| Authors | Tony Hansen | |
| I-D last updated | 2015-09-03 | |
| Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -02
by Robert Sparks
(diff)
Genart Last Call review of -03 by Robert Sparks (diff) Genart Telechat review of -04 by Robert Sparks Secdir Last Call review of -02 by Vincent Roca (diff) Secdir Telechat review of -04 by Vincent Roca Opsdir Last Call review of -02 by Mehmet Ersue (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Vincent Roca |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Telechat review on draft-hansen-scram-sha256 by Security Area Directorate Assigned | |
| Reviewed revision | 04 | |
| Result | Ready | |
| Completed | 2015-09-03 |
review-hansen-scram-sha256-04-secdir-telechat-roca-2015-09-03-00
Hello, I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate’s ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. IMHO, the document is ready. Just a minor comment: it is said in the Security Considerations section that: «an iteration count of 4096 takes around 0.5 seconds on current mobile handsets.» It may be useful to give an idea of the features of a representative «current mobile handset». It can simplify comparisons in a few years from now as things are evolving quite rapidly in this domain. Cheers, Vincent Attachment: signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail