Telechat Review of draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-alt-mark-08
review-ietf-6man-ipv6-alt-mark-08-intdir-telechat-halley-2021-08-05-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-alt-mark
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 17)
Type Telechat Review
Team Internet Area Directorate (intdir)
Deadline 2021-08-08
Requested 2021-07-29
Requested by Éric Vyncke
Authors Giuseppe Fioccola , Tianran Zhou , Mauro Cociglio , Fengwei Qin , Ran Pang
I-D last updated 2021-08-05
Completed reviews Secdir Last Call review of -06 by Christopher A. Wood (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -06 by Stewart Bryant (diff)
Tsvart Last Call review of -06 by Yoshifumi Nishida (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -08 by Stewart Bryant (diff)
Secdir Telechat review of -08 by Christopher A. Wood (diff)
Intdir Telechat review of -08 by Bob Halley (diff)
Comments 
No need for deep IPv6 knowledge to review this document. Thank you. Eric
Assignment Reviewer Bob Halley
State Completed
Request Telechat review on draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-alt-mark by Internet Area Directorate Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-dir/jK7AqtjLFXWS4U9mryqewF897l4
Reviewed revision 08 (document currently at 17)
Result Ready
Completed 2021-08-05
review-ietf-6man-ipv6-alt-mark-08-intdir-telechat-halley-2021-08-05-00
 I am an assigned INT directorate reviewer for draft-ietf-dnssd-prireq.  These
 comments were written primarily for the benefit of the Internet Area
 Directors.   Document editors and shepherd(s) should treat these comments just
 like they would treat comments from any other IETF contributors and resolve
 them along with any other Last Call comments that have been received. For more
 details on the INT Directorate, see http://www.ietf.org/iesg/directorate.html.

I think this draft is ready.  It's clear, and explains the motivation behind
ideas well.  I do not have any technical concerns about it.