Last Call Review of draft-ietf-ace-usecases-09
review-ietf-ace-usecases-09-genart-lc-halpern-2016-01-29-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-ace-usecases
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 10)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2015-10-20
Requested 2015-10-15
Draft last updated 2016-01-29
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -09 by Joel Halpern (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -09 by Adam Montville (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -09 by Mahesh Jethanandani (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Joel Halpern
State Completed
Review review-ietf-ace-usecases-09-genart-lc-halpern-2016-01-29
Reviewed rev. 09 (document currently at 10)
Review result Ready with Issues
Review completed: 2016-01-29

Review
review-ietf-ace-usecases-09-genart-lc-halpern-2016-01-29

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<

http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-ietf-ace-usecases-07
    ACE use cases
Reviewer: Joel M. Halpern
Review Date: 15-Oct-2015
IETF LC End Date: 22-Oct-2015
IESG Telechat date: 22-Oct-2015

Summary: This document is ready to be published as an Informational RFC.

Major issues: N/A

Minor issues:
    I believe ACE should be spelled out in the title.



    I am mildly concerned that some of the requirements may be 


undecidable or unmeetable, such as a requirement for easily sanitizing a 


log to leave needed historical information while removing personal 


information (U2.12).  I understand the motivation for this.  But I think 


the document might be helped by a warning about their being conflicting 


goals within or among some requirements.




Nits/editorial comments: N/A