Last Call Review of draft-ietf-ace-usecases-09
review-ietf-ace-usecases-09-genart-lc-halpern-2016-01-29-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-ace-usecases |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 10) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
| Deadline | 2015-10-20 | |
| Requested | 2015-10-15 | |
| Authors | Ludwig Seitz , Stefanie Gerdes , Göran Selander , Mehdi Mani , Sandeep Kumar | |
| Draft last updated | 2016-01-29 | |
| Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -09
by
Joel M. Halpern
(diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -09 by Adam W. Montville (diff) Opsdir Last Call review of -09 by Mahesh Jethanandani (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Joel M. Halpern |
| State | Completed | |
| Review |
review-ietf-ace-usecases-09-genart-lc-halpern-2016-01-29
|
|
| Reviewed revision | 09 (document currently at 10) | |
| Result | Ready with Issues | |
| Completed | 2016-01-29 |
review-ietf-ace-usecases-09-genart-lc-halpern-2016-01-29-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. For more information, please see the FAQ at < http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-ace-usecases-07 ACE use cases Reviewer: Joel M. Halpern Review Date: 15-Oct-2015 IETF LC End Date: 22-Oct-2015 IESG Telechat date: 22-Oct-2015 Summary: This document is ready to be published as an Informational RFC. Major issues: N/A Minor issues: I believe ACE should be spelled out in the title. I am mildly concerned that some of the requirements may be undecidable or unmeetable, such as a requirement for easily sanitizing a log to leave needed historical information while removing personal information (U2.12). I understand the motivation for this. But I think the document might be helped by a warning about their being conflicting goals within or among some requirements. Nits/editorial comments: N/A