Last Call Review of draft-ietf-acme-tls-alpn-06
review-ietf-acme-tls-alpn-06-secdir-lc-migault-2019-09-25-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-acme-tls-alpn
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 07)
Type Last Call Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2019-09-25
Requested 2019-09-11
Authors Roland Bracewell Shoemaker
I-D last updated 2019-09-25
Completed reviews Secdir Last Call review of -06 by Daniel Migault (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -06 by Linda Dunbar (diff)
Artart Last Call review of -06 by Martin Thomson (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Daniel Migault
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-acme-tls-alpn by Security Area Directorate Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/Ex88DBYthpsXjtU4wJcT6zcVmc8
Reviewed revision 06 (document currently at 07)
Result Ready
Completed 2019-09-25
review-ietf-acme-tls-alpn-06-secdir-lc-migault-2019-09-25-00
Hi,

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the
IESG.  These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the
security area directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat
these comments just like any other last call comments.

The summary of the review is Ready

My only comment was that the text above may need some clarification.
"""This separation of layers can improve security and usability of ACME
validation.""" More specifically, it was unclear to me if the improvement
concerns the presented challenge versus the other ones (DNS or HTTP)  or
something else.

Yours,
Daniel