Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-add-ddr-08
review-ietf-add-ddr-08-intdir-lc-zuniga-2022-07-12-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-add-ddr
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 10)
Type Last Call Review
Team Internet Area Directorate (intdir)
Deadline 2022-07-08
Requested 2022-06-24
Requested by Éric Vyncke
Authors Tommy Pauly , Eric Kinnear , Christopher A. Wood , Patrick McManus , Tommy Jensen
I-D last updated 2022-07-12
Completed reviews Intdir Last Call review of -08 by Juan-Carlos Zúñiga (diff)
Artart Last Call review of -07 by Thomas Fossati (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -08 by Robert Sparks (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -08 by Benjamin M. Schwartz (diff)
Comments
This review should probably be combined with https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-add-svcb-dns/ review

Thanks

-éric
Assignment Reviewer Juan-Carlos Zúñiga
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-add-ddr by Internet Area Directorate Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-dir/LNblyjHvLbliyuFCYw7SIS7_5_k
Reviewed revision 08 (document currently at 10)
Result Ready w/issues
Completed 2022-07-12
review-ietf-add-ddr-08-intdir-lc-zuniga-2022-07-12-00
I am an assigned INT directorate reviewer for <draft-ietf-add-ddr-08>. These
comments were written primarily for the benefit of the Internet Area Directors.
Document editors and shepherd(s) should treat these comments just like they
would treat comments from any other IETF contributors and resolve them along
with any other Last Call comments that have been received. For more details on
the INT Directorate, see https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/intdir/about/.

From Section 1 Introduction, it is not obvious if the two mechanisms mentioned
in the section are alternative or complementary, and how they relate to the
DoT, DoQ and DoH requirements introduced in the same section.

Section 4 gets into details about DoT and DoQ using IP addresses - it would be
good to explain a little more about it in the Intro section.

In Section 5, the requirements seem to overlap with draft-ietf-add-svcb-dns. It
would be good to further clarify the relationship between the two
specifications.

Finally, since multiple solutions are presented, some recommendations about
when, how and why one mechanism should be used vs the other would be useful to
the reader.

Best,

Juan-Carlos