Skip to main content

Telechat Review of draft-ietf-anima-prefix-management-06
review-ietf-anima-prefix-management-06-genart-telechat-romascanu-2017-12-05-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-anima-prefix-management
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 07)
Type Telechat Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2017-12-12
Requested 2017-11-12
Authors Sheng Jiang , Zongpeng Du , Brian E. Carpenter , Qiong Sun
I-D last updated 2017-12-05
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -05 by Dan Romascanu (diff)
Rtgdir Last Call review of -05 by Geoff Huston (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -06 by Fred Baker (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -05 by Russ Housley (diff)
Secdir Telechat review of -06 by Catherine Meadows (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -06 by Dan Romascanu (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Dan Romascanu
State Completed
Request Telechat review on draft-ietf-anima-prefix-management by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned
Reviewed revision 06 (document currently at 07)
Result Ready
Completed 2017-12-05
review-ietf-anima-prefix-management-06-genart-telechat-romascanu-2017-12-05-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-ietf-anima-prefix-management-06
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review Date: 2017-12-05
IETF LC End Date: 2017-10-12
IESG Telechat date: 2017-12-14

Summary: Ready

This document describes an ANIMA solution for IPv6 prefix management at the
edge of large-scale ISP networks sketches an IPv4 solution extension to support
IPv4 prefixes. It is well written, targeting the operators of ISP networks,
describes the solution in a manner very clear for people familiar with the ANI
framework, with useful deployment examples. A few minor issues and nits that
were raised in my initial reviews were clarified, the majority of them by text
changes.

Major issues:

Minor issues:

Nits/editorial comments: