Last Call Review of draft-ietf-behave-ipfix-nat-logging-06
review-ietf-behave-ipfix-nat-logging-06-secdir-lc-hallam-baker-2016-02-11-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-behave-ipfix-nat-logging
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 13)
Type Last Call Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2016-02-12
Requested 2016-01-21
Authors Senthil Sivakumar , Reinaldo Penno
I-D last updated 2016-02-11
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -06 by Paul Kyzivat (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -11 by Paul Kyzivat (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -06 by Phillip Hallam-Baker (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -06 by Dan Romascanu (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Phillip Hallam-Baker
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-behave-ipfix-nat-logging by Security Area Directorate Assigned
Reviewed revision 06 (document currently at 13)
Result Ready
Completed 2016-02-11
review-ietf-behave-ipfix-nat-logging-06-secdir-lc-hallam-baker-2016-02-11-00
 draft-ietf-behave-ipfix-nat-logging.all at tools.ietf.org

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the
IESG.  These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the
security area directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat
these comments just like any other last call comments.


It is a logging format, you keep data, it might be disclosed.

This document does not seem to add to the issues set out in RFC7011
which is cited in the references section. The cited reference is
comprehensive, relevant and recent.

Nothing further to add from a security point of view.