Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-bess-bgp-srv6-args-05
review-ietf-bess-bgp-srv6-args-05-genart-lc-knodel-2025-02-21-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-bess-bgp-srv6-args
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 10)
Type IETF Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2025-03-04
Requested 2025-02-18
Authors Ketan Talaulikar , Syed Kamran Raza , Jorge Rabadan , Wen Lin
I-D last updated 2025-07-19 (Latest revision 2025-05-09)
Completed reviews Genart IETF Last Call review of -05 by Mallory Knodel (diff)
Rtgdir Early review of -05 by Zheng Zhang (diff)
Secdir IETF Last Call review of -06 by Mališa Vučinić (diff)
Opsdir Telechat review of -06 by Joe Clarke (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Mallory Knodel
State Completed
Request IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-bess-bgp-srv6-args by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/IfWBlTID2u4M8yH0deYSODTyZRo
Reviewed revision 05 (document currently at 10)
Result Ready
Completed 2025-02-21
review-ietf-bess-bgp-srv6-args-05-genart-lc-knodel-2025-02-21-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/gen/GenArtFAQ>.

Document: draft-ietf-bess-bgp-srv6-args-??
Reviewer: Mallory Knodel
Review Date: 2025-02-21
IETF LC End Date: 2025-03-04
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat

Summary: This document updates recommendations "for the signaling and
processing of SRv6 SID advertisements for BGP Service routes associated with
SRv6 Endpoint Behaviors that support arguments" based on lessons learned from
implementations of RFC9252.

Major issues: None.

Minor issues: It would perhaps help readers if in the introduction to the
document that updates RFC9252, the authors quoted one seemingly critical
passage, namely the description of the Transposition Scheme:

   This later form of encoding is
   referred to as the Transposition Scheme, where the SRv6 SID Structure
   Sub-Sub-TLV describes the sizes of the parts of the SRv6 SID and also
   indicates the offset of the variable part along with its length in
   the SRv6 SID value.  The use of the Transposition Scheme is
   RECOMMENDED for the specific service encodings that allow it, as
   described ...

This passage might then be modified in a clearer manner given the goals of the
current document. Or perhaps this belongs in Section 4 on backwards
compatibility.

Nits/editorial comments: None. Well written and straight forward.