Last Call Review of draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-extranet-04
review-ietf-bess-mvpn-extranet-04-genart-lc-holmberg-2015-12-01-00

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART,
please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>

Document:                                                        
draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-extranet-04.txt

Reviewer:                                                           Christer
Holmberg

Review Date:                                                     1 December 2015

IETF LC End Date:                                             4 December 2015

IETF Telechat Date:                                         17 December 2015

Summary:           The document is well written, and almost ready for
publication. However, I have some general editorial comments that I’d like the
authors to
 address.

Major Issues: None

Minor Issues: None

Editorial Issues:



General:



QG_1:



Throughout the document, there are places where the text say “We follow”, “We
say”, etc. I suggest to talk about the “document” instead of “We”.



I also wonder whether all the “We says are needed.





QG_2:



The Abstract says that the document updates RFCs 6513, 6514, and 6625. However,
there is no dedicated section(s) which defines the updates.



I also think the Introduction should contain some general overview text on what
is updated.



If possible, it would also be good to have dedicated “Updates to RFC XXXX”
chapters, so that people can easily find what exactly has been updated.





QG_3:



The Abstract and Introduction say “Previous RFCs”. I suggest to list the
relevant RFCs instead.



Something like:



                “

RFC 6513 and RFC6514 specify the procedures…”