Last Call Review of draft-ietf-calext-valarm-extensions-04
review-ietf-calext-valarm-extensions-04-secdir-lc-smyslov-2021-02-10-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-calext-valarm-extensions
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 07)
Type Last Call Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2021-02-16
Requested 2021-02-02
Authors Cyrus Daboo, Kenneth Murchison
Draft last updated 2021-02-10
Completed reviews Secdir Last Call review of -04 by Valery Smyslov (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -04 by Roni Even (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Valery Smyslov 
State Completed
Review review-ietf-calext-valarm-extensions-04-secdir-lc-smyslov-2021-02-10
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/jWTUEi-j-Tpmh8utWxXHqMvXKtw
Reviewed rev. 04 (document currently at 07)
Review result Ready
Review completed: 2021-02-10

Review
review-ietf-calext-valarm-extensions-04-secdir-lc-smyslov-2021-02-10

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing
effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.  These
comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors.
Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other
last call comments.

The draft defines a set of extensions to the VALARM component of iCalendar.
The document is short and well written, its Security Considerations and Privacy Considerations
sections are sensible. I found the document ready.

Nit: I would recommend adding a sentence to the Security Considerations section saying that 
these VALARM extensions inherited security properties of iCalendar [RFC5545].