Telechat Review of draft-ietf-capport-rfc7710bis-07
review-ietf-capport-rfc7710bis-07-iotdir-telechat-krishnan-2020-06-11-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-capport-rfc7710bis |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 11) | |
| Type | Telechat Review | |
| Team | Internet of Things Directorate (iotdir) | |
| Deadline | 2020-06-09 | |
| Requested | 2020-05-27 | |
| Requested by | Éric Vyncke | |
| Authors | Warren "Ace" Kumari , Erik Kline | |
| Draft last updated | 2020-06-11 | |
| Completed reviews |
Secdir Last Call review of -04
by
Rifaat Shekh-Yusef
(diff)
Genart Last Call review of -04 by Stewart Bryant (diff) Opsdir Last Call review of -04 by Tim Chown (diff) Iotdir Telechat review of -07 by Suresh Krishnan (diff) Intdir Telechat review of -07 by Ralf Weber (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Suresh Krishnan |
| State | Completed | |
| Review |
review-ietf-capport-rfc7710bis-07-iotdir-telechat-krishnan-2020-06-11
|
|
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/iot-directorate/6-_LrXi_gaRCh_TKd1ifYh97_2Q | |
| Reviewed revision | 07 (document currently at 11) | |
| Result | Ready | |
| Completed | 2020-06-11 |
review-ietf-capport-rfc7710bis-07-iotdir-telechat-krishnan-2020-06-11-00
Overall I found the draft to be well written and easy to read but I one minor comment. * It is not clear how a constrained device (potentially without a user interface) would handle the URI that it receives to escape the captive portal. Has this been thought of? I think some new text in this regard would be useful here, though one could make the case for this to be handled in the API draft instead.