Last Call Review of draft-ietf-curdle-pkix-06
review-ietf-curdle-pkix-06-genart-lc-dupont-2017-10-09-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-curdle-pkix
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 08)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2017-10-09
Requested 2017-09-25
Other Reviews Opsdir Last Call review of -06 by Scott Bradner (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -06 by Shawn Emery (diff)
Review State Completed
Reviewer Francis Dupont
Review review-ietf-curdle-pkix-06-genart-lc-dupont-2017-10-09
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/jBrQTQAs2cT3JaCJzMkIyAZl_CU
Reviewed rev. 06 (document currently at 08)
Review result Ready
Draft last updated 2017-10-09
Review completed: 2017-10-09

Review
review-ietf-curdle-pkix-06-genart-lc-dupont-2017-10-09

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-ietf-curdle-pkix-06.txt
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 20171002
IETF LC End Date: 20171009
IESG Telechat date: unknown

Summary: Ready

Major issues: None

Minor issues: None

Nits/editorial comments: 
 - ToC page 2 and 11 page 14: Acknowledgements -> Acknowledgments

 - 2 page 3: there is now a RFC updating 2119 to solve the lower case
  keyword issue. I don't know if there is a policy about this, e.g.,
  improving the standard 2119 reference text. I'll ask to the gen-art.

 - 3 page 4: "a small number of implementations may still require"
  for instance of (not ambiguous) use of a 2119 keyword in lower case
  (so now a priori in its English language meaning).

Regards

Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr

PS: BTW I know this draft before being assigned as its gen-art reviewer,
I even pulled a request to define these OIDs in Botan...
So thanks to have done that!