Last Call Review of draft-ietf-curdle-rc4-die-die-die-14
review-ietf-curdle-rc4-die-die-die-14-opsdir-lc-baker-2019-01-03-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-curdle-rc4-die-die-die |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 18) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | Ops Directorate (opsdir) | |
| Deadline | 2019-01-09 | |
| Requested | 2018-12-26 | |
| Authors | Loganaden Velvindron | |
| I-D last updated | 2019-01-03 | |
| Completed reviews |
Secdir Last Call review of -14
by Aanchal Malhotra
(diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -14 by Fred Baker (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Fred Baker |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-curdle-rc4-die-die-die by Ops Directorate Assigned | |
| Reviewed revision | 14 (document currently at 18) | |
| Result | Ready | |
| Completed | 2019-01-03 |
review-ietf-curdle-rc4-die-die-die-14-opsdir-lc-baker-2019-01-03-00
I have read the indicated draft. It is simple and to the point. I don't know and therefore can't say whether operators use this particular cipher, but I suspect not. In any event, assuming the statements it makes about weak keys are true, I would describe it as "ready".