Last Call Review of draft-ietf-detnet-tsn-vpn-over-mpls-05
review-ietf-detnet-tsn-vpn-over-mpls-05-genart-lc-gurbani-2021-01-29-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-detnet-tsn-vpn-over-mpls |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 07) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
| Deadline | 2021-02-05 | |
| Requested | 2021-01-22 | |
| Authors | Balazs Varga , János Farkas , Andrew G. Malis , Stewart Bryant , Don Fedyk | |
| Draft last updated | 2021-01-29 | |
| Completed reviews |
Secdir Last Call review of -05
by
Magnus Nystrom
(diff)
Tsvart Last Call review of -05 by Joerg Ott (diff) Genart Last Call review of -05 by Vijay K. Gurbani (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Vijay K. Gurbani |
| State | Completed | |
| Review |
review-ietf-detnet-tsn-vpn-over-mpls-05-genart-lc-gurbani-2021-01-29
|
|
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/n_TVsz8wlWEwuJswY6UIfPz3tpM | |
| Reviewed revision | 05 (document currently at 07) | |
| Result | Ready | |
| Completed | 2021-01-29 |
review-ietf-detnet-tsn-vpn-over-mpls-05-genart-lc-gurbani-2021-01-29-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-detnet-tsn-vpn-over-mpls-05 Reviewer: Vijay K. Gurbani Review Date: 2021-01-29 IETF LC End Date: 2021-02-05 IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat Summary: Ready to be published as a Proposed Standard. Generally, the I-D is quite heavy on acronyms, some of which I suspect comes with the domain the I-D targets. While I suspect that most readers versed in the area will not have any problems expanding the acronyms, I just wanted to mention this for the authors to perhaps do a once-over to see if any acronyms need expansion. (I list a couple in the Nits section.) Major issues: 0 Minor issues: 0 Nits/editorial comments: 2 - Figure 2: - What is "Tnl"? (Tunnel?) - What does "AC" mean? - IDnits is reporting a couple of unused references ([RFC5921] and [RFC8660]), and that draft-ietf-detnet-mpls has been published as RFC 8964.