Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-stateful-issues-11
review-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-stateful-issues-11-opsdir-lc-bonica-2015-03-11-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-stateful-issues
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 12)
Type Last Call Review
Team Ops Directorate (opsdir)
Deadline 2015-03-10
Requested 2015-03-01
Authors Ole Trøan , Bernie Volz , Marcin Siodelski
Draft last updated 2015-03-11
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -11 by Roni Even (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -11 by Dan Harkins (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -11 by Ron Bonica (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Ron Bonica
State Completed
Review review-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-stateful-issues-11-opsdir-lc-bonica-2015-03-11
Reviewed revision 11 (document currently at 12)
Result Ready
Completed 2015-03-11
review-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-stateful-issues-11-opsdir-lc-bonica-2015-03-11-00
Folks,

I have reviewed this document as part of the Operational directorate's ongoing
effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.  These
comments were written with the intent of improving the operational aspects of
the IETF drafts. Comments that are not addressed in last call may be included
in AD reviews during the IESG review.  Document editors and WG chairs should
treat these comments just like any other last call comments.

Status: Ready (nits are debatable)

Major comments:

      This is a very well-written draft. The problem is explained well. The
      solution is examined from every possible angle.

Nits:

The Nit-checker complains about a malformed reference on line 606. It complains
because this document has no reference [17]. However, the text in question is
UPDATING RFC 3315, which does have a reference [17]. So, I recommend that we
let this nit slide and let the RFC editor figure out what to do about it.

Ron Bonica