Last Call Review of draft-ietf-dispatch-javascript-mjs-10
review-ietf-dispatch-javascript-mjs-10-artart-lc-nottingham-2021-10-26-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-dispatch-javascript-mjs |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 17) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | ART Area Review Team (artart) | |
Deadline | 2021-11-15 | |
Requested | 2021-10-25 | |
Authors | Matthew A. Miller , Myles Borins , Mathias Bynens , Bradley Farias | |
I-D last updated | 2021-10-26 | |
Completed reviews |
I18ndir Early review of -07
by John R. Levine
(diff)
Artart Last Call review of -10 by Mark Nottingham (diff) Secdir Last Call review of -10 by Radia Perlman (diff) Genart Last Call review of -10 by Robert Sparks (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Mark Nottingham |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-dispatch-javascript-mjs by ART Area Review Team Assigned | |
Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/art/ZqGVqHzWML-S5t3ZD-0qEoZJUOw | |
Reviewed revision | 10 (document currently at 17) | |
Result | Ready w/nits | |
Completed | 2021-10-26 |
review-ietf-dispatch-javascript-mjs-10-artart-lc-nottingham-2021-10-26-00
This document is ready for publication, with two small nits / questions about the content. ## Nits - In Section 3, the reader is left hanging -- I expected a statement along the lines of 'The media types in this document allow such out of band information to be conveyed.' - Throughout, the phrase 'is not considered part of this document' is a bit odd -- do you mean 'is not controlled by this document' or similar?