Last Call Review of draft-ietf-dispatch-javascript-mjs-10
review-ietf-dispatch-javascript-mjs-10-artart-lc-nottingham-2021-10-26-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-dispatch-javascript-mjs |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 17) | |
| Type | IETF Last Call Review | |
| Team | ART Area Review Team (artart) | |
| Deadline | 2021-11-15 | |
| Requested | 2021-10-25 | |
| Authors | Matthew A. Miller , Myles Borins , Mathias Bynens , Bradley Farias | |
| I-D last updated | 2022-05-06 (Latest revision 2022-03-01) | |
| Completed reviews |
I18ndir Early review of -07
by John R. Levine
(diff)
Artart IETF Last Call review of -10 by Mark Nottingham (diff) Secdir IETF Last Call review of -10 by Radia Perlman (diff) Genart IETF Last Call review of -10 by Robert Sparks (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Mark Nottingham |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-dispatch-javascript-mjs by ART Area Review Team Assigned | |
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/art/ZqGVqHzWML-S5t3ZD-0qEoZJUOw | |
| Reviewed revision | 10 (document currently at 17) | |
| Result | Ready w/nits | |
| Completed | 2021-10-26 |
review-ietf-dispatch-javascript-mjs-10-artart-lc-nottingham-2021-10-26-00
This document is ready for publication, with two small nits / questions about the content. ## Nits - In Section 3, the reader is left hanging -- I expected a statement along the lines of 'The media types in this document allow such out of band information to be conveyed.' - Throughout, the phrase 'is not considered part of this document' is a bit odd -- do you mean 'is not controlled by this document' or similar?