Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-emu-crypto-bind-04

Request Review of draft-ietf-emu-crypto-bind
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 04)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2013-07-25
Requested 2013-07-11
Authors Sam Hartman , Margaret Cullen , Dacheng Zhang
I-D last updated 2013-07-27
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -04 by Francis Dupont
Assignment Reviewer Francis Dupont
State Completed
Review review-ietf-emu-crypto-bind-04-genart-lc-dupont-2013-07-27
Reviewed revision 04
Result Ready
Completed 2013-07-27
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at


Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.

Document: draft-ietf-emu-crypto-bind-04.txt
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 20130722
IETF LC End Date: 20130724
IESG Telechat date: unknown

Summary: Ready

Major issues: None

Minor issues: None

Nits/editorial comments:
 - headers page 2: the keyword section is in the headers (vs the body).
  This is not the usual place... (BTW it is not the first time I do
  this comment so either the policy is different than I believe or
  there is a draft skeleton with this in it?)

 - Toc page 3 and 7 page 22: Acknowledgements -> Acknowledgments

 - 3.2.4 page 14: IMHO it should be fine to have an informational
  reference about EMSK (my idea is to help people to add it in design
  from the beginning).

 - 4.2 page 17: edition problem? in:

   should require mutual authentication be present in the session.

   to accomplish this, implementations including channel binding or

 - 5.2 page 19 (at the end of the line) EAp- -> EAP-

 - 5.2 page 19: my spell checker has a concern with "interoperably"


Francis.Dupont at