Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-git-using-github-04
review-ietf-git-using-github-04-opsdir-lc-wu-2020-02-23-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-git-using-github
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 06)
Type Last Call Review
Team Ops Directorate (opsdir)
Deadline 2020-03-03
Requested 2020-02-18
Authors Martin Thomson , Barbara Stark
Draft last updated 2020-02-23
Completed reviews Opsdir Last Call review of -04 by Qin Wu (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -05 by Derek Atkins (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -04 by Brian E. Carpenter (diff)
Tsvart Last Call review of -04 by David L. Black (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -05 by Brian E. Carpenter (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Qin Wu
State Completed
Review review-ietf-git-using-github-04-opsdir-lc-wu-2020-02-23
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ops-dir/P-5JAGxQPrLKDfc4L0DCkBZP_uQ
Reviewed revision 04 (document currently at 06)
Result Has Nits
Completed 2020-02-23
review-ietf-git-using-github-04-opsdir-lc-wu-2020-02-23-00
I have reviewed this document as part of the Ops area directorate's ongoing
effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.  These
comments were written primarily for the benefit of the Ops area directors.
Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other
last call comments.

Good work, this draft provides working group github usage guidance and document
best practice that can be referenced by all IETF working groups. A few nits
that need to be fixed before moving forward: 1. Section 5.2,3rd paragraph: The
word "err" is a little bit weird to me. s/err more toward/lean more toward 2.
Section 5.2 5th paragraph: "As mailing lists remain the primary venue for
discussion of
   substantive matters, this mode and the document management only modes
   remain those most compatible with existing work practices for Working
   Groups."
I feel the second half sentence is disconnected and not clear. should this be
changed into "...only modes which remain those most" …? 3.Section 5.4.2,last
paragraph The label “v2” has some ambiguity, since each draft may have already
made multiple revisions. The latest version may not start with v1. In addition,
should the decision label or component label be registered in IANA?