Last Call Review of draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis-05
review-ietf-httpbis-sfbis-05-genart-lc-bryant-2024-02-17-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 06)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2024-02-12
Requested 2024-01-29
Authors Mark Nottingham , Poul-Henning Kamp
I-D last updated 2024-02-17
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -05 by Stewart Bryant (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -05 by Peter E. Yee (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Stewart Bryant
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/9j1f2Adg0AyD4P-nYPyisWW6EZ8
Reviewed revision 05 (document currently at 06)
Result Ready w/nits
Completed 2024-02-17
review-ietf-httpbis-sfbis-05-genart-lc-bryant-2024-02-17-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/gen/GenArtFAQ>.

Document: draft-ietf-httpbis-sfbis-05
Reviewer: Stewart Bryant
Review Date: 2024-02-17
IETF LC End Date: 2024-02-12
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat

Summary:A well written document and apart from the missing reference ready to
go.

Major issues:None

Minor issues:None

Nits/editorial comments:

ID-Nits reports: Missing Reference: 'RFC3986' is mentioned on line 285, but not
defined

======

   Example-List: sugar, tea, rum

At one level an innocent grocery list, however I imagine that in 2024 there may
need to be multiple trigger warnings on the items chosen.