Last Call Review of draft-ietf-httpbis-unprompted-auth-10
review-ietf-httpbis-unprompted-auth-10-artart-lc-sparks-2024-09-09-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-httpbis-unprompted-auth
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 12)
Type IETF Last Call Review
Team ART Area Review Team (artart)
Deadline 2024-09-11
Requested 2024-08-28
Authors David Schinazi , David Oliver , Jonathan Hoyland
I-D last updated 2025-02-14 (Latest revision 2024-09-19)
Completed reviews Secdir IETF Last Call review of -10 by Rich Salz (diff)
Genart IETF Last Call review of -10 by Reese Enghardt (diff)
Opsdir IETF Last Call review of -10 by Ran Chen (diff)
Artart IETF Last Call review of -10 by Robert Sparks (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Robert Sparks
State Completed
Request IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-httpbis-unprompted-auth by ART Area Review Team Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/art/Za55EWjFWoeZpBVxDdWfYvUatXc
Reviewed revision 10 (document currently at 12)
Result Ready
Completed 2024-09-09
review-ietf-httpbis-unprompted-auth-10-artart-lc-sparks-2024-09-09-00
Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review result: Ready for publication as a proposed standard RFC

I had one question, even though I think the document is fine as is:
Is there any need to version this, or if there was a need for a significant
change to how it works, would you just shift to a different authentication
scheme?

RjS