Last Call Review of draft-ietf-httpbis-unprompted-auth-10
review-ietf-httpbis-unprompted-auth-10-artart-lc-sparks-2024-09-09-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-httpbis-unprompted-auth |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 12) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | ART Area Review Team (artart) | |
| Deadline | 2024-09-11 | |
| Requested | 2024-08-28 | |
| Authors | David Schinazi , David Oliver , Jonathan Hoyland | |
| I-D last updated | 2024-09-09 | |
| Completed reviews |
Secdir Last Call review of -10
by Rich Salz
(diff)
Genart Last Call review of -10 by Reese Enghardt (diff) Opsdir Last Call review of -10 by Ran Chen (diff) Artart Last Call review of -10 by Robert Sparks (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Robert Sparks |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-httpbis-unprompted-auth by ART Area Review Team Assigned | |
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/art/Za55EWjFWoeZpBVxDdWfYvUatXc | |
| Reviewed revision | 10 (document currently at 12) | |
| Result | Ready | |
| Completed | 2024-09-09 |
review-ietf-httpbis-unprompted-auth-10-artart-lc-sparks-2024-09-09-00
Reviewer: Robert Sparks Review result: Ready for publication as a proposed standard RFC I had one question, even though I think the document is fine as is: Is there any need to version this, or if there was a need for a significant change to how it works, would you just shift to a different authentication scheme? RjS