Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-idr-cpr-06
review-ietf-idr-cpr-06-tsvart-lc-black-2025-01-31-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-idr-cpr
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 08)
Type IETF Last Call Review
Team Transport Area Review Team (tsvart)
Deadline 2025-02-07
Requested 2025-01-24
Authors Haibo Wang , Jie Dong , Ketan Talaulikar , hantao , Ran Chen
I-D last updated 2025-05-29 (Latest revision 2025-02-23)
Completed reviews Rtgdir Early review of -02 by Yingzhen Qu (diff)
Opsdir Early review of -02 by Dan Romascanu (diff)
Secdir Early review of -03 by Brian Weis (diff)
Genart IETF Last Call review of -06 by Vijay K. Gurbani (diff)
Tsvart IETF Last Call review of -06 by David L. Black (diff)
Opsdir IETF Last Call review of -07 by Linda Dunbar (diff)
Secdir IETF Last Call review of -06 by Brian Weis (diff)
Assignment Reviewer David L. Black
State Completed
Request IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-idr-cpr by Transport Area Review Team Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsv-art/jBu6sAuBtabXmfl2S6wVohsatQ8
Reviewed revision 06 (document currently at 08)
Result Ready w/nits
Completed 2025-01-31
review-ietf-idr-cpr-06-tsvart-lc-black-2025-01-31-00
This document has been reviewed as part of the transport area review team's
ongoing effort to review key IETF documents. These comments were written
primarily for the transport area directors, but are copied to the document's
authors and WG to allow them to address any issues raised and also to the IETF
discussion list for information.

When done at the time of IETF Last Call, the authors should consider this
review as part of the last-call comments they receive. Please always CC
tsv-art@ietf.org if you reply to or forward this review.

This document describes how to advertise colored IPv6 prefixes for SRv6
via BGP. As a routing protocol document that extends BGP, this document
does not raise any transport-specific concerns.

I noticed one nit - this draft has a strong dependence on
draft-hr-spring-intentaware-routing-using-color, which is an Expired
Internet-Draft.  That draft is cited as the source of requirements
and problem statement for this draft, and that draft is cited twice in
the Operational Considerations section as a foundation for guidance to
operators.  I strongly encourage the authors to find a better reference
for these purposes than an expired Internet-Draft and/or include more
material on these topics in the absence of an equally useful reference.