Last Call Review of draft-ietf-ippm-metric-registry-20
review-ietf-ippm-metric-registry-20-secdir-lc-xia-2019-11-04-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-ippm-metric-registry
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 23)
Type Last Call Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2019-11-06
Requested 2019-10-23
Authors Marcelo Bagnulo, BenoƮt Claise, Philip Eardley, Al Morton, Aamer Akhter
Draft last updated 2019-11-04
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -20 by Roni Even (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -20 by Liang Xia (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Liang Xia
State Completed
Review review-ietf-ippm-metric-registry-20-secdir-lc-xia-2019-11-04
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/6WXEKcZqlRy01m1ScpNRYafAK5c
Reviewed rev. 20 (document currently at 23)
Review result Ready
Review completed: 2019-11-04

Review
review-ietf-ippm-metric-registry-20-secdir-lc-xia-2019-11-04

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's  ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the  IESG.  These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the  security area directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments.

This document defines the format for the IANA Performance Metrics Registry. This document also gives a set of guidelines for Registered Performance Metric requesters and reviewers.

I agree with the statement in Security Considerations that "This draft defines a registry structure, and does not itself introduce any new security considerations for the Internet." So, the specific security consideration for the defined new Performance Metrics Registry should be described in the mandatory references and evaluated and passed by the appointed Performance Metrics Experts.

In summary, there is no more security issues left for this document.