IETF Last Call Review of draft-ietf-ippm-qoo-06
review-ietf-ippm-qoo-06-secdir-lc-vucinic-2026-02-17-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-ippm-qoo |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 07) | |
| Type | IETF Last Call Review | |
| Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
| Deadline | 2026-02-13 | |
| Requested | 2026-01-30 | |
| Authors | Bjørn Ivar Teigen , Magnus Olden , Ike Kunze | |
| I-D last updated | 2026-03-08 (Latest revision 2026-02-19) | |
| Completed reviews |
Perfmetrdir Early review of -04
by Paul Aitken
(diff)
Tsvart IETF Last Call review of -07 by Joerg Ott Genart IETF Last Call review of -06 by Paul Kyzivat (diff) Secdir IETF Last Call review of -06 by Mališa Vučinić (diff) Artart IETF Last Call review of -06 by Martin Thomson (diff) Opsdir Telechat review of -07 by Will (Shucheng) LIU |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Mališa Vučinić |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-ippm-qoo by Security Area Directorate Assigned | |
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/S-BDMYA7cwKqCFIkzIfPcumqJxY | |
| Reviewed revision | 06 (document currently at 07) | |
| Result | Ready | |
| Completed | 2026-02-17 |
review-ietf-ippm-qoo-06-secdir-lc-vucinic-2026-02-17-00
I reviewed this document as part of the Security Directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the Security Area Directors. Document authors, document editors, and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other IETF Last Call comments. The document is clear and well-written. It does not define a new protocol, yet it discusses the security considerations arising from the operational perspective. I agree with the considerations outlined and I find the proposed mitigations effective. I have no additional considerations pertaining to the proposed framework.