Telechat Review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-multi-sa-performance-08
review-ietf-ipsecme-multi-sa-performance-08-intdir-telechat-winters-2024-04-30-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-ipsecme-multi-sa-performance |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 09) | |
| Type | Telechat Review | |
| Team | Internet Area Directorate (intdir) | |
| Deadline | 2024-04-26 | |
| Requested | 2024-04-09 | |
| Requested by | Éric Vyncke | |
| Authors | Antony Antony , Tobias Brunner , Steffen Klassert , Paul Wouters | |
| I-D last updated | 2024-07-19 (Latest revision 2024-05-02) | |
| Completed reviews |
Secdir IETF Last Call review of -06
by Rich Salz
(diff)
Intdir Telechat review of -08 by Timothy Winters (diff) Opsdir IETF Last Call review of -09 by Jouni Korhonen Tsvart IETF Last Call review of -06 by Marcus Ihlar (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Timothy Winters |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Telechat review on draft-ietf-ipsecme-multi-sa-performance by Internet Area Directorate Assigned | |
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-dir/vtyeRxDWJcEwgnGy9M5IvDaTF9k | |
| Reviewed revision | 08 (document currently at 09) | |
| Result | Ready | |
| Completed | 2024-04-30 |
review-ietf-ipsecme-multi-sa-performance-08-intdir-telechat-winters-2024-04-30-00
I am an assigned INT directorate reviewer for draft-ietf-ipsecme-multi-sa-performance-08. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the Internet Area Directors. Document editors and shepherd(s) should treat these comments just like they would treat comments from any other IETF contributors and resolve them along with any other Last Call comments that have been received. For more details on the INT Directorate, see https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/intdir/about/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/intdir/about/> Summary: This document specifies how to load balance Child SAs to improve performance using IKEv2. It's well written document that gives clear implementation guidance of this mechanism. There are no Internet area issues with this document as it's changes in how implementation create Child SAs and utilize them based on resources. Based on my review, if I was on the IESG I would ballot this document as NO OBJECTION.