IETF Last Call Review of draft-ietf-lamps-pq-composite-sigs-14
review-ietf-lamps-pq-composite-sigs-14-genart-lc-evens-2026-01-30-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-lamps-pq-composite-sigs |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 19) | |
| Type | IETF Last Call Review | |
| Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
| Deadline | 2026-02-03 | |
| Requested | 2026-01-20 | |
| Authors | Mike Ounsworth , John Gray , Massimiliano Pala , Jan Klaußner , Scott Fluhrer | |
| I-D last updated | 2026-06-02 (Latest revision 2026-04-21) | |
| Completed reviews |
Genart IETF Last Call review of -14
by Tim Evens
(diff)
Secdir IETF Last Call review of -14 by Donald E. Eastlake 3rd (diff) Secdir Telechat review of -15 by Donald E. Eastlake 3rd (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Tim Evens |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-lamps-pq-composite-sigs by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned | |
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/ByyE7ySjsFf8sYZNV-DbHv3wufk | |
| Reviewed revision | 14 (document currently at 19) | |
| Result | Ready w/nits | |
| Completed | 2026-01-30 |
review-ietf-lamps-pq-composite-sigs-14-genart-lc-evens-2026-01-30-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at <https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/gen/GenArtFAQ>. Document: draft-ietf-lamps-pq-composite-sigs-?? Reviewer: Tim Evens Review Date: 2026-01-30 IETF LC End Date: 2026-02-03 IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat Summary: This is an excellent specification that balances practical deployment needs with cryptographic rigor. The document is thorough, well-organized, and provides valuable guidance for the post-quantum transition. The security analysis in Section 9 is particularly strong and appropriately honest about limitations. The test vectors and implementation considerations are comprehensive. Major issues: None Minor issues: None Nits/editorial comments: In section 5.2, first paragraph, there is a typo with extension. In section 9.2. second paragraph, there is a typo with security and consideration. In appendix G, second paragraph, there is a typo with Postgraduate.