Skip to main content

IETF Last Call Review of draft-ietf-lamps-pq-composite-sigs-14
review-ietf-lamps-pq-composite-sigs-14-genart-lc-evens-2026-01-30-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-lamps-pq-composite-sigs
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 19)
Type IETF Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2026-02-03
Requested 2026-01-20
Authors Mike Ounsworth , John Gray , Massimiliano Pala , Jan Klaußner , Scott Fluhrer
I-D last updated 2026-06-02 (Latest revision 2026-04-21)
Completed reviews Genart IETF Last Call review of -14 by Tim Evens (diff)
Secdir IETF Last Call review of -14 by Donald E. Eastlake 3rd (diff)
Secdir Telechat review of -15 by Donald E. Eastlake 3rd (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Tim Evens
State Completed
Request IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-lamps-pq-composite-sigs by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/ByyE7ySjsFf8sYZNV-DbHv3wufk
Reviewed revision 14 (document currently at 19)
Result Ready w/nits
Completed 2026-01-30
review-ietf-lamps-pq-composite-sigs-14-genart-lc-evens-2026-01-30-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/gen/GenArtFAQ>.

Document: draft-ietf-lamps-pq-composite-sigs-??
Reviewer: Tim Evens
Review Date: 2026-01-30
IETF LC End Date: 2026-02-03
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat

Summary:

This is an excellent specification that balances practical deployment needs
with cryptographic rigor. The document is thorough, well-organized, and
provides valuable guidance for the post-quantum transition. The security
analysis in Section 9 is particularly strong and appropriately honest about
limitations. The test vectors and implementation considerations are
comprehensive.

Major issues:
None

Minor issues:
None

Nits/editorial comments:

In section 5.2, first paragraph, there is a typo with extension.
In section 9.2. second paragraph,  there is a typo with security and
consideration. In appendix G, second paragraph, there is a typo with
Postgraduate.