Last Call Review of draft-ietf-manet-nhdp-olsrv2-tlv-extension-01
review-ietf-manet-nhdp-olsrv2-tlv-extension-01-genart-lc-carpenter-2014-02-04-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-manet-nhdp-olsrv2-tlv-extension
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 05)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2014-02-07
Requested 2014-01-31
Draft last updated 2014-02-04
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -01 by Brian Carpenter (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -01 by Tero Kivinen (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Brian Carpenter
State Completed
Review review-ietf-manet-nhdp-olsrv2-tlv-extension-01-genart-lc-carpenter-2014-02-04
Reviewed rev. 01 (document currently at 05)
Review result Ready
Review completed: 2014-02-04

Review
review-ietf-manet-nhdp-olsrv2-tlv-extension-01-genart-lc-carpenter-2014-02-04

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
<

http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.

Document: draft-ietf-manet-nhdp-olsrv2-tlv-extension-01.txt
Reviewer: Brian Carpenter
Review Date: 2014-02-04
IETF LC End Date: 2014-02-07
IESG Telechat date:

Summary:  Ready
--------

Comments:
---------

This draft is well-written and clear.

It retro-fits extensibility to two existing specifications.
As an author of RFC 6709 I find this an interesting exercise. Do
the hints in 

http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6709#section-4

 help,
especially bullet 2?

Minor Issues:
------------

It is highly unusual for a draft to formally update another draft
(draft-ietf-manet-olsrv2), even though the latter is approved and
in the RFC queue. If we were a rational organisation, that draft
would be updated before publication.

(The writeup actually says "The Optimized Link State Routing Protocol
version 2 (OLSRv2) has been published as Standards Track." but that is
inaccurate.)