Last Call Review of draft-ietf-manet-nhdp-olsrv2-tlv-extension-01
review-ietf-manet-nhdp-olsrv2-tlv-extension-01-genart-lc-carpenter-2014-02-04-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-manet-nhdp-olsrv2-tlv-extension |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 05) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
Deadline | 2014-02-07 | |
Requested | 2014-01-31 | |
Authors | Christopher Dearlove , Thomas H. Clausen | |
I-D last updated | 2014-02-04 | |
Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -01
by Brian E. Carpenter
(diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -01 by Tero Kivinen (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Brian E. Carpenter |
State | Completed | |
Review |
review-ietf-manet-nhdp-olsrv2-tlv-extension-01-genart-lc-carpenter-2014-02-04
|
|
Reviewed revision | 01 (document currently at 05) | |
Result | Ready | |
Completed | 2014-02-04 |
review-ietf-manet-nhdp-olsrv2-tlv-extension-01-genart-lc-carpenter-2014-02-04-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at < http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-manet-nhdp-olsrv2-tlv-extension-01.txt Reviewer: Brian Carpenter Review Date: 2014-02-04 IETF LC End Date: 2014-02-07 IESG Telechat date: Summary: Ready -------- Comments: --------- This draft is well-written and clear. It retro-fits extensibility to two existing specifications. As an author of RFC 6709 I find this an interesting exercise. Do the hints in http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6709#section-4 help, especially bullet 2? Minor Issues: ------------ It is highly unusual for a draft to formally update another draft (draft-ietf-manet-olsrv2), even though the latter is approved and in the RFC queue. If we were a rational organisation, that draft would be updated before publication. (The writeup actually says "The Optimized Link State Routing Protocol version 2 (OLSRv2) has been published as Standards Track." but that is inaccurate.)