Last Call Review of draft-ietf-manet-olsrv2-management-snapshot-03
review-ietf-manet-olsrv2-management-snapshot-03-genart-lc-even-2015-06-14-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-manet-olsrv2-management-snapshot |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 03) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
| Deadline | 2015-06-12 | |
| Requested | 2015-06-01 | |
| Authors | Thomas H. Clausen , Ulrich Herberg | |
| I-D last updated | 2015-06-14 | |
| Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -03
by Roni Even
Opsdir Early review of -03 by Susan Hares |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Roni Even |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-manet-olsrv2-management-snapshot by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned | |
| Reviewed revision | 03 | |
| Result | Ready w/issues | |
| Completed | 2015-06-14 |
review-ietf-manet-olsrv2-management-snapshot-03-genart-lc-even-2015-06-14-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-manet-olsrv2-management-snapshot-03 Reviewer: Roni Even Review Date: 2015–6-14 IETF LC End Date: 2015–6-21 IESG Telechat date: Summary: This draft is ready for publication as an Informational RFC. Major issues: Minor issues: I was wondering about the value of C, the document references RFC 5497 which says A protocol using this time representation MUST define the value of C. Is there some recommendation here? Nits/editorial comments: In section 3.3 I am not sure what the following sentence in parentheses means: (up to and including mechanisms involving depleted uranium)