Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5661sesqui-msns-03
review-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5661sesqui-msns-03-genart-lc-gurbani-2019-12-17-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5661sesqui-msns
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 04)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2019-11-25
Requested 2019-11-04
Authors David Noveck , Chuck Lever
I-D last updated 2019-12-17
Completed reviews Secdir Last Call review of -03 by Sean Turner (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -03 by Vijay K. Gurbani (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Vijay K. Gurbani
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5661sesqui-msns by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/Zjc8S1wiBIzET1TCdOhAZ3PfY1Q
Reviewed revision 03 (document currently at 04)
Result Ready w/nits
Completed 2019-12-17
review-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5661sesqui-msns-03-genart-lc-gurbani-2019-12-17-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5661sesqui-msns-??
Reviewer: Vijay K. Gurbani
Review Date: 2019-12-17
IETF LC End Date: 2019-11-25
IESG Telechat date: 2019-12-19

I have reviewed about 1/2 of the I-D, up to Section 12 (page 297).  I will
review the remaining 1/2 before the telchat, but I suspect that given my very
high level overview of the draft, my disposition will not change.

Summary:  This draft is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard.  In the
portion of the draft I reviewed, there are some minor nits that can easily be
fixed.

Major issues: 0

Minor issues: 0

Nits/editorial comments: 4 ("Sn" means Section n):
1/ Appendix A: s/No correesponding explanation/No corresponding explanation/
2/ S1: s/authoritative complete/authoritatively complete/
3/ S1.7 (page 12): "associable" or "associated to"
4/ There are many long lines that go beyond 80 characters, see S1.9, the bullet
that starts with “o  Open files can be …”,   Table 1, S4.2.1, etc.

Thanks,

- vijay