Last Call Review of draft-ietf-oauth-jwk-thumbprint-uri-01
review-ietf-oauth-jwk-thumbprint-uri-01-opsdir-lc-bradner-2022-05-08-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-oauth-jwk-thumbprint-uri |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 03) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | Ops Directorate (opsdir) | |
| Deadline | 2022-05-09 | |
| Requested | 2022-04-25 | |
| Authors | Michael B. Jones , Kristina Yasuda | |
| I-D last updated | 2022-05-08 | |
| Completed reviews |
Artart Last Call review of -01
by Gonzalo Salgueiro
(diff)
Genart Last Call review of -01 by Robert Sparks (diff) Opsdir Last Call review of -01 by Scott O. Bradner (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Scott O. Bradner |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-oauth-jwk-thumbprint-uri by Ops Directorate Assigned | |
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ops-dir/urzYpa0keFOJQNKplrYHHzO-RFg | |
| Reviewed revision | 01 (document currently at 03) | |
| Result | Has nits | |
| Completed | 2022-05-08 |
review-ietf-oauth-jwk-thumbprint-uri-01-opsdir-lc-bradner-2022-05-08-00
This is an OPS-DIR review of JWK Thumbprint URI (draft-ietf-oauth-jwk-thumbprint-uri). This document is well written and clearly defines the technology. one nit – I do not see a need for section 2 (Requirements Notation and Conventions) since the capitalized terms are not used in the document. One place that a MUST could be used is in section 5 (Mandatory to Implement Hash Algorithm) and it might be useful to do so since some implementation checklists that I have seen key off of the RFC 2119 capitalized terms but, that said, the language in the current document is very clear.