IETF Last Call Review of draft-ietf-opsawg-prefix-lengths-08
review-ietf-opsawg-prefix-lengths-08-intdir-lc-jiang-2025-11-09-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-opsawg-prefix-lengths
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 14)
Type IETF Last Call Review
Team Internet Area Directorate (intdir)
Deadline 2025-11-10
Requested 2025-09-29
Requested by Mahesh Jethanandani
Authors Oliver Gasser , Randy Bush , Massimo Candela , Russ Housley
I-D last updated 2026-01-12 (Latest revision 2025-12-17)
Completed reviews Opsdir IETF Last Call review of -07 by Adrian Farrel (diff)
Secdir IETF Last Call review of -07 by Valery Smyslov (diff)
Rtgdir IETF Last Call review of -07 by Michael Richardson (diff)
Intdir IETF Last Call review of -08 by Sheng Jiang (diff)
Genart IETF Last Call review of -08 by Roni Even (diff)
Secdir IETF Last Call review of -08 by Valery Smyslov (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Sheng Jiang
State Completed
Request IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-opsawg-prefix-lengths by Internet Area Directorate Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-dir/WrF8hfUaklt_Ujidv9RecrfuJt4
Reviewed revision 08 (document currently at 14)
Result Ready
Completed 2025-11-09
review-ietf-opsawg-prefix-lengths-08-intdir-lc-jiang-2025-11-09-00
I have reviewed this document as part of the IntDir directorate's ongoing
effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. Comments that
are not addressed in last call may be included in AD reviews during the IESG
review. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like
any other last call comments.

Title: Entering IPv6 Zone Identifiers in User Interfaces
Document: draft-ietf-opsawg-prefix-lengths-08

This standard track document specifies how to augment the RPSL inetnum. It 
also describes an optional scheme that uses the RPKI to authenticate the 
prefixlen files. It is well-written. I do not find any obvious technical 
issues or Nits. It is ready for publication as a RFC.