Last Call Review of draft-ietf-ospf-security-extension-manual-keying-09
review-ietf-ospf-security-extension-manual-keying-09-opsdir-lc-dunbar-2014-10-16-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-ospf-security-extension-manual-keying |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 11) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | Ops Directorate (opsdir) | |
Deadline | 2014-10-17 | |
Requested | 2014-10-09 | |
Authors | Manav Bhatia , Sam Hartman , Dacheng Zhang , Acee Lindem | |
I-D last updated | 2014-10-16 | |
Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -09
by Suresh Krishnan
(diff)
Genart Last Call review of -11 by Suresh Krishnan Secdir Last Call review of -09 by Shaun Cooley (diff) Opsdir Last Call review of -09 by Linda Dunbar (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Linda Dunbar |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-ospf-security-extension-manual-keying by Ops Directorate Assigned | |
Reviewed revision | 09 (document currently at 11) | |
Result | Has nits | |
Completed | 2014-10-16 |
review-ietf-ospf-security-extension-manual-keying-09-opsdir-lc-dunbar-2014-10-16-00
I have reviewed this document as part of the Operational directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the operational area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. I think the draft has described very clearly the new authentication sequence number mechanism. A few minor suggestions and questions: - Section 4 OSPF packet key selection: o is this “Key” same as the “Ko” defined by RFC5709? If yes, should add the reference. o Is this “Key” same as the "Key ID" in Figure 1? - Section 6: o There are three “keys”: Authentication Key, cryptographic Key, and Protocol-Specific Authentication Key (Ks). Which one is used in the Key ID field of Figure 1? o Cheers, Linda Dunbar