Telechat Review of draft-ietf-payload-rfc3189bis-
review-ietf-payload-rfc3189bis-genart-telechat-dupont-2011-11-01-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-payload-rfc3189bis |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 03) | |
| Type | Telechat Review | |
| Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
| Deadline | 2011-11-01 | |
| Requested | 2011-11-01 | |
| Authors | Kazuhiro Mishima , Stephen L. Casner , Katsushi Kobayashi , Carsten Bormann | |
| Draft last updated | 2011-11-01 | |
| Completed reviews |
Genart Telechat review of -??
by
Francis Dupont
|
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Francis Dupont |
| State | Completed | |
| Review |
review-ietf-payload-rfc3189bis-genart-telechat-dupont-2011-11-01
|
|
| Completed | 2011-11-01 |
review-ietf-payload-rfc3189bis-genart-telechat-dupont-2011-11-01-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at < http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-payload-rfc3189bis-02.txt Reviewer: Francis Dupont Review Date: 20111014 IETF LC End Date: 20110926 IESG Telechat date: unknown Summary: Ready Major issues: None Minor issues: None Nits/editorial comments: I've seen some comments during the last call, perhaps this is why the current version is 03 but I reviewed (and forgot to send the review) the version 02. Comments: - 3.3.1 page 14: I suggest m=* in place of m=?? - 4 page 15 (comment): in general encryption is done after compression for crypto reasons and common sense: encryption gives a perfectly random result, i.e., something impossible to compress... - Authors' Addresses page 19: United States -> USA Regards (and sorry for the delay, but my comments could (should!) be handled by the RFC Editor) Francis.Dupont at fdupont.fr