Last Call Review of draft-ietf-pce-gmpls-pcep-extensions-12
review-ietf-pce-gmpls-pcep-extensions-12-opsdir-lc-zhou-2018-11-26-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-pce-gmpls-pcep-extensions
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 16)
Type Last Call Review
Team Ops Directorate (opsdir)
Deadline 2018-10-29
Requested 2018-10-15
Authors Cyril Margaria , Oscar Gonzalez de Dios , Fatai Zhang
I-D last updated 2018-11-26
Completed reviews Rtgdir Last Call review of -12 by Dave Sinicrope (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -12 by Tianran Zhou (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -12 by Vincent Roca (diff)
Secdir Telechat review of -13 by Vincent Roca (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -14 by Elwyn B. Davies (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Tianran Zhou
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-pce-gmpls-pcep-extensions by Ops Directorate Assigned
Reviewed revision 12 (document currently at 16)
Result Has issues
Completed 2018-11-26
review-ietf-pce-gmpls-pcep-extensions-12-opsdir-lc-zhou-2018-11-26-00
I have reviewed this document as part of the Operational directorate's ongoing
effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.  These
comments were written with the intent of improving the operational aspects of
the IETF drafts. Comments that are not addressed in last call may be included
in AD reviews during the IESG review.  Document editors and WG chairs should
treat these comments just like any other last call comments.

I did not see any special operational or network management related issue. But
I saw some other issues.

Major:
This document includes too many Terms and Acronyms without explanation nor
expansion. Most of them are specific to GMPLS/transport network. I strongly
suggest the authors can have a Terms section to explain them all.

Minor:
It seems the abstraction is too simple with just one sentence. Could you
describe a littel more about the what and why?

Cheers,
Tianran