Last Call Review of draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp-18
review-ietf-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp-18-secdir-lc-salowey-2024-11-15-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 20) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
Deadline | 2024-11-11 | |
Requested | 2024-10-21 | |
Authors | Mike Koldychev , Siva Sivabalan , Samuel Sidor , Colby Barth , Shuping Peng , Hooman Bidgoli | |
I-D last updated | 2024-11-15 | |
Completed reviews |
Rtgdir Early review of -13
by Ines Robles
(diff)
Genart Last Call review of -18 by Robert Sparks (diff) Secdir Last Call review of -18 by Joseph A. Salowey (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Joseph A. Salowey |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp by Security Area Directorate Assigned | |
Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/hJGvEqsj31QszvKElbST3FRlbiE | |
Reviewed revision | 18 (document currently at 20) | |
Result | Ready | |
Completed | 2024-11-15 |
review-ietf-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp-18-secdir-lc-salowey-2024-11-15-00
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. This document has a security considerations section that references several other documents and adds a comment on additional information disclosure. I looked at the referenced security considerations and they are quite extensive. My main complaint would be that the reader has to go trace through the trail of documents to track down the security considerations, however the referenced documents contain material which is essential in implementing this document. I think this document is ready.