Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-rmcat-eval-criteria-11
review-ietf-rmcat-eval-criteria-11-secdir-lc-wallace-2020-02-26-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-rmcat-eval-criteria
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 14)
Type Last Call Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2020-02-26
Requested 2020-02-12
Authors Varun Singh , Joerg Ott , Stefan Holmer
I-D last updated 2020-02-26
Completed reviews Secdir Last Call review of -11 by Carl Wallace (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -11 by Joel M. Halpern (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Carl Wallace
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-rmcat-eval-criteria by Security Area Directorate Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/rOj0__elRlsF89zvdnO0tRG9AgA
Reviewed revision 11 (document currently at 14)
Result Has nits
Completed 2020-02-25
review-ietf-rmcat-eval-criteria-11-secdir-lc-wallace-2020-02-26-00
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing
effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.  These
comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors.
Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other
last call comments.

This document describes the guidelines to evaluate new congestion control
algorithms for interactive point-to-point real-time media. It asserts that as a
document providing evaluation criteria and parameters for assessing and
comparing performance that it is not subject to security considerations, but
that evaluated protocols may be. This seems sufficient. The document is ready
with some minor nits like an incomplete sentence in third paragraph of first
section and some difficult to parse language in the jitter section ("jitter is
a smoothed estimate of jitter", for example).