Last Call Review of draft-ietf-rmcat-eval-criteria-11
review-ietf-rmcat-eval-criteria-11-secdir-lc-wallace-2020-02-26-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-rmcat-eval-criteria |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 14) | |
| Type | IETF Last Call Review | |
| Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
| Deadline | 2020-02-26 | |
| Requested | 2020-02-12 | |
| Authors | Varun Singh , Joerg Ott , Stefan Holmer | |
| I-D last updated | 2021-01-19 (Latest revision 2020-03-19) | |
| Completed reviews |
Secdir IETF Last Call review of -11
by Carl Wallace
(diff)
Genart IETF Last Call review of -11 by Joel M. Halpern (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Carl Wallace |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-rmcat-eval-criteria by Security Area Directorate Assigned | |
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/rOj0__elRlsF89zvdnO0tRG9AgA | |
| Reviewed revision | 11 (document currently at 14) | |
| Result | Has nits | |
| Completed | 2020-02-25 |
review-ietf-rmcat-eval-criteria-11-secdir-lc-wallace-2020-02-26-00
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing
effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These
comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors.
Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other
last call comments.
This document describes the guidelines to evaluate new congestion control
algorithms for interactive point-to-point real-time media. It asserts that as a
document providing evaluation criteria and parameters for assessing and
comparing performance that it is not subject to security considerations, but
that evaluated protocols may be. This seems sufficient. The document is ready
with some minor nits like an incomplete sentence in third paragraph of first
section and some difficult to parse language in the jitter section ("jitter is
a smoothed estimate of jitter", for example).